‹ vs CBJ (Sep 22, 2026)vs PIT (Sep 26, 2026) ›

September 24, 2026

Little Caesars Arena | Detroit

BUF 2 – 3 DET

FINAL / OT

Head-to-Head vs DET all-time
1ST2ND3RDOTT
BUF11002
DET10113
Shots on goal BUF 19, DET 26W D. TarasovL C. Ellis
Game Leaders
0.9
GAME SCORE
3
SHOTS
24:35
TOI (F)
23:17
TOI (D)
.889 (16/18)
SAVE %

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P ▾
+/-
PIM
SOG
ixG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
Special Teams
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGFxGAxGF%xGF% RelCFCACF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGSPP ShiftsPP TOIPP SharePK ShiftsPK TOIPK Share
#20 J. Kulich (C)
1
0
1
+1
0
1
0.21
+0.8
8:580.060.1038.6%-6.6%3633.3%-6.7%50.0%100.0%2.000
0.10.8
11:1312.4%20:173.8%
10:28
#52 T. Kuntar (C)
1
0
1
+1
5
2
0.26
+0.7
8:360.380.1769.7%+33.4%61037.5%-2.2%36.4%100.0%1.333
0.20.9
00:000.0%00:000.0%
10:55
#70 J. Richard (RW)
0
1
1
+1
0
0
–
–
7:460.380.0295.2%+61.8%6746.2%+8.4%55.6%100.0%1.250
0.70.8
21:3916.8%00:000.0%
14:19
#86 N. Ostlund (C)
0
1
1
0
2
1
0.59
-0.6
9:500.060.1136.5%-8.9%3827.3%-14.0%42.9%100.0%2.000
0.80.5
22:4528.0%41:3922.1%
23:56
#57 R. Mrtka (D)
0
1
1
+1
0
1
0.01
0.0
9:230.290.1271.3%+32.7%9756.3%+21.8%61.5%100.0%1.167
0.80.9
00:000.0%10:051.1%
14:22
#13 M. Peca (C)
0
0
0
+1
0
1
0.00
0.0
8:070.380.1769.4%+33.0%6940.0%+1.0%45.5%100.0%1.250
0.00.1
21:5018.6%00:000.0%
17:47
#15 J. Danforth (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
2
0.57
-0.6
7:230.350.0197.5%+63.2%9852.9%+17.9%50.0%–1.000
0.70.2
02:1322.5%31:2619.2%
17:40
#27 A. McDonough (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.16
-0.2
7:000.170.0194.9%+54.7%7750.0%+13.3%50.0%–1.000
0.30.1
11:0310.7%00:000.0%
10:53
#28 L. Valente (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0.05
-0.1
8:270.260.6727.9%-29.9%8850.0%+13.8%42.9%–1.000
0.00.0
10:162.7%00:000.0%
11:21
#41 J. Polin (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
3
0.30
-0.3
6:020.240.5231.5%-20.5%6460.0%+24.1%55.6%–1.000
0.50.3
22:0521.2%00:000.0%
10:54
#48 T. Kozak (C)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.12
-0.1
8:030.330.0197.4%+62.6%8753.3%+17.7%54.5%–1.000
0.40.3
21:4918.5%31:4323.0%
16:58
#77 T. Bordeleau (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
2
0.24
-0.2
6:060.070.5212.6%-44.4%5550.0%+12.5%50.0%–1.000
0.40.3
22:5429.5%00:000.0%
15:40
#94 K. Helenius (C)
0
0
0
+1
0
2
0.15
-0.2
10:450.060.1136.5%-8.9%3827.3%-14.0%42.9%100.0%2.000
0.20.2
22:5529.7%21:0113.6%
24:35
#33 R. Johnson (D)
0
0
0
+2
0
2
0.07
-0.1
10:540.350.2657.0%+17.2%10952.6%+18.1%56.3%100.0%1.286
0.40.7
00:000.0%10:051.1%
15:01
#44 D. Gilbert (D)
0
0
0
0
0
0
–
–
10:560.280.0196.9%+60.3%51033.3%-7.3%40.0%100.0%1.333
0.20.3
10:284.7%22:5839.7%
21:55
#62 G. McCarthy (D)
0
0
0
-1
6
0
–
–
12:450.220.1658.5%+16.7%41323.5%-20.3%25.0%–1.000
-0.6-0.6
00:000.0%00:000.0%
17:34
#73 Z. Metsa (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.01
0.0
10:180.290.5335.4%-15.1%9950.0%+14.3%50.0%–1.000
0.10.1
21:4016.9%02:5839.7%
23:17
#76 V. Komarov (D)
0
0
0
0
4
0
–
–
10:360.130.5319.3%-36.6%81044.4%+6.9%41.7%–1.000
-0.4-0.3
00:000.0%00:000.0%
16:05
Total
2
3
5
17
19
2.75
5.6
9:507:28

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice. On-ice xG counts shots on goal only, where a team's xG and a skater's own ixG also count missed shots.

PP TOI and PK TOI are a skater's time on the ice during his team's power plays and penalty kills. PP Share and PK Share are that time as a part of the team's power-play or penalty-kill time (the Total row). PP Shifts and PK Shifts count shifts that began in that state.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOI ▾Dec
#92 C. Ellis1822.2.889+0.20.141:59O
#34 A. Lyon810.9.875-0.10.018:00–
Game Control
BUFDETBUF shareDET share
5-on-5
Expected goals1.421.7644.7%55.3%
Shot attempts294539.2%60.8%
Shot attempts, score-adjusted30.242.941.3%58.7%
High-danger chances4640.0%60.0%
Power play
Goals, of chances0 of 3 (0%)1 of 3 (33%)
Expected goals1.321.2850.7%49.3%
Shot attempts161551.6%48.4%
High-danger chances3442.9%57.1%
Shorthanded expected goals0.000.000.0%100.0%
All situations
Expected goals2.753.0747.3%52.7%
Shot attempts466342.2%57.8%
High-danger chances71041.2%58.8%
How this is measured

Shot attempts include missed and blocked shots. Expected goals (xG) weigh each unblocked shot by its chance of going in; high-danger is 0.12 xG or more. Power-play goals and chances are the NHL's line where it publishes one (otherwise the play-by-play's stretches of man-advantage time), which counts a double minor as two chances and a 5-on-3 from two penalties as two, so the count can run above the number of penalties in the Full Game Log below. Score-adjusted is the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site.

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFDET

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-DET.
 1ST2ND3RDOTTotal
Faceoffs Won11-1310-59-90-130-28
Hits6-67-72-80-015-21
Takeaways1-10-03-20-04-3
Giveaways6-613-45-30-024-13
PDO (5v5): BUF 1.075DET 0.925. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

OT 0:33
BUF4663DETshot attempts
+17+90-9-17shot attemptsBUFDET

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 47%.

OT 0:33
BUF0%100%DETchance of winning
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUF
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. OT 00:33A. DeBrincat (1), power play 49% to 0%-49
  2. P3 07:13S. Dries (1) 82% to 48%-34
  3. P2 00:33J. Kulich (1) 47% to 68%+21
  4. P1 10:48T. Kuntar (1) 47% to 66%+19

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value is home ice alone.

Expected Goals

Cumulative xG from the game. What is xG?

OT 20:00
BUF2.753.07DETexpected goals
01234123OT
Most expected goals, by skater
BUFxGGDETxGG
N. Ostlund0.590A. DeBrincat0.651
J. Danforth0.570L. Raymond0.530
J. Polin0.300D. Shine0.310
T. Kuntar0.261A. Sandin-Pellikka0.281
T. Bordeleau0.240M. Brandsegg-Nygård0.260

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

xG range
Replay
OT 0:33
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Shift Rhythm

Neither team spent an unusual amount of time on long shifts.

BUFDETTypical game, 2025–26
Time on long shifts (5v5)0:010:040:53
Shot attempts against in that time001

Goals and shift length

How long the scored-on skaters had been on the ice.

PeriodClockScored byPast 1:00Longest
P110:48BUF0 of 5C. Mazur 0:38
P116:11DET PP0 of 4J. Kulich 0:05
P20:33BUF0 of 5A. Copp 0:33
P37:13DET0 of 0
OT0:33DET PP0 of 0
How this is measured

Long shift. A skater who stepped on at even strength and stayed out for 1:00 or more of unbroken play, mostly at even strength. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. A team is on long shifts at 5v5 when 3 or more of its skaters are past that minute, and only the time past the minute counts: the first minute plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the team is defending (in 2025–26, a team on long shifts took 24% of the shot attempts in that time, which was 1.9% of all 5v5 play). Time on long shifts is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Goals. Each goal lists the skaters it was scored on and how long each had been out, with the same unbroken play clock. Power-play goals count too, though a penalty kill unit runs long by design. Empty-net and shootout goals are left out. Stretches under 0:15 with no shot attempt or goal against are not listed, though their time is in the totals.

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2025–26 regular season, counting both teams (164 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. This season has no measured row yet, so 2025–26 stands in. A sentence at the top only appears when time on long shifts is at least 0:30 and among the highest fifth of those, or when a 5v5 goal went in with 3 or more of the scored-on team's skaters past the minute.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is on a long shift and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

19 shifts, averaging 0:45. 1 was a long shift.

Replay
Shift 19
Long shiftGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:48P2avg 0:430:000:301:001:302:0012468101214161819Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2025–26: 0:45, 0:50 (the long change), 0:47.

Noah Ostlund by period

On ice, all situations. xG counts shots on goal. EV Avg counts shifts that started at even strength.

PeriodShiftsAvgEV AvgTOIxGFxGACFCASOGSOGAGFGA
P190:410:486:110.000.41080401
P2100:480:438:030.200.03762210
P3––––––––––––
OT––––––––––––
Game190:450:4514:140.200.437142611

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model. On-ice xG counts shots on goal only, where a team's xG and a skater's own ixG also count missed shots.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOI ▾xGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Kulich–Ostlund–Helenius18:020.060.1038.6%103633.3%-10.8%-8.4%3312
Danforth–McDonough–Kozak16:120.170.0194.9%007750.0%8.0%51.4%5541
Peca–Kuntar–Richard16:070.200.0291.5%104736.4%-7.6%48.6%3421
Bordeleau–Polin–Valente15:080.070.5212.6%005455.6%13.7%-42.3%4423
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOI ▾xGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Gilbert–McCarthy110:110.220.0196.1%0041028.6%-16.9%53.7%3622
Komarov–Metsa19:330.130.5319.3%008947.1%4.7%-34.8%5624
Johnson–Mrtka19:110.290.1271.3%109756.3%15.6%28.7%8563
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1A. DeBrincatDET | RW1G 0A 1P
2S. DriesDET | C1G 0A 1P
3J. KulichBUF | C1G 0A 1P

Team Stats

BUFDET
19Shots on Goal26
13.3%Shooting % (5v5)5.9%
.941Save % (5v5).867
1.075PDO (5v5)0.925
30 (52%)Faceoffs Won28 (48%)
3Power Play Chances3
0%PP%33%
67%PK%100%
0PPG1
13Penalty Minutes13
14Hits17
16Blocked Shots13
24Giveaways11
2Takeaways2

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
10:48GOAL (BUF): Trevor Kuntar (1), assists: Jake RichardxG 0.18
16:11GOAL (DET): Axel Sandin-Pellikka (2), assists: Anton Johansson, Emmitt Finnie(PP)xG 0.10
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
00:33GOAL (BUF): Jiri Kulich (1), assists: Noah Ostlund, Radim MrtkaxG 0.06
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
07:13GOAL (DET): Sheldon Dries (1), assists: Jacob Bryson, Wilmer SkoogxG 0.05
20:00Period end
OT
00:00Period start
00:33GOAL (DET): Alex DeBrincat (1), assists: Lucas Raymond, Moritz Seider(PP)xG 0.16
00:33Period end
00:33Game end
‹ vs CBJ (Sep 22, 2026)vs PIT (Sep 26, 2026) ›