Franchise History
Standings by Year
Final NHL standings as of the last day of the regular season, for any year on record. View by Division, Conference, or League, and track where Buffalo (and every other team) stood across a season with the trend chart below.
1983–84 Final Standings
1983–84 Game ResultsBuffalo finished 4th in the league, 2nd in the Adams.
Prince of Wales
| Team | GP | W | L | T | PTS ▾ | PTS% | GF | GA | SOW | SOL | DIFF | xPTS | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | y-New York Islanders | 80 | 50 | 26 | 4 | 104 | .650 | 357 | 269 | – | – | +88 | 102 | W4 |
| 2 | x-Boston Bruins | 80 | 49 | 25 | 6 | 104 | .650 | 336 | 261 | – | – | +75 | 100 | W5 |
| 3 | x-Buffalo Sabres | 80 | 48 | 25 | 7 | 103 | .644 | 315 | 257 | – | – | +58 | 96 | W1 |
| 4 | x-Washington Capitals | 80 | 48 | 27 | 5 | 101 | .631 | 308 | 226 | – | – | +82 | 104 | W1 |
| 5 | x-Philadelphia Flyers | 80 | 44 | 26 | 10 | 98 | .613 | 350 | 290 | – | – | +60 | 95 | L1 |
| 6 | x-Quebec Nordiques | 80 | 42 | 28 | 10 | 94 | .588 | 360 | 278 | – | – | +82 | 100 | W2 |
| 7 | x-New York Rangers | 80 | 42 | 29 | 9 | 93 | .581 | 314 | 304 | – | – | +10 | 83 | W1 |
| 8 | x-Montréal Canadiens | 80 | 35 | 40 | 5 | 75 | .469 | 286 | 295 | – | – | -9 | 78 | L6 |
| 9 | Hartford Whalers | 80 | 28 | 42 | 10 | 66 | .412 | 288 | 320 | – | – | -32 | 72 | L1 |
| 10 | New Jersey Devils | 80 | 17 | 56 | 7 | 41 | .256 | 231 | 350 | – | – | -119 | 49 | L8 |
| 11 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 80 | 16 | 58 | 6 | 38 | .237 | 254 | 390 | – | – | -136 | 48 | L6 |
Clarence Campbell
| Team | GP | W | L | T | PTS ▾ | PTS% | GF | GA | SOW | SOL | DIFF | xPTS | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | y-Edmonton Oilers | 80 | 57 | 18 | 5 | 119 | .744 | 446 | 314 | – | – | +132 | 107 | W3 |
| 2 | y-Minnesota North Stars | 80 | 39 | 31 | 10 | 88 | .550 | 345 | 344 | – | – | +1 | 80 | L1 |
| 3 | x-Calgary Flames | 80 | 34 | 32 | 14 | 82 | .512 | 311 | 314 | – | – | -3 | 79 | L1 |
| 4 | x-Vancouver Canucks | 80 | 32 | 39 | 9 | 73 | .456 | 306 | 328 | – | – | -22 | 74 | T1 |
| 5 | x-Winnipeg Jets (1979) | 80 | 31 | 38 | 11 | 73 | .456 | 340 | 374 | – | – | -34 | 72 | W2 |
| 6 | x-St. Louis Blues | 80 | 32 | 41 | 7 | 71 | .444 | 293 | 316 | – | – | -23 | 74 | L3 |
| 7 | x-Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 31 | 42 | 7 | 69 | .431 | 298 | 323 | – | – | -25 | 74 | L2 |
| 8 | x-Chicago Blackhawks | 80 | 30 | 42 | 8 | 68 | .425 | 277 | 311 | – | – | -34 | 71 | W2 |
| 9 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 80 | 26 | 45 | 9 | 61 | .381 | 303 | 387 | – | – | -84 | 61 | L1 |
| 10 | Los Angeles Kings | 80 | 23 | 44 | 13 | 59 | .369 | 309 | 376 | – | – | -67 | 64 | L1 |
x - clinched playoff spot, y - clinched division, z - clinched conference, p - clinched Presidents' Trophy.
xPTS is the points a team’s goals for and against project: the Pythagorean win estimate GF² / (GF² + GA²), scaled to points as win% × 2 × games played. It follows the current pace on any “as of” date. +/-xPTS is real points minus xPTS, after removing each team’s overtime-loss points. That step matters because xPTS splits a flat 2 points per game, while an overtime game pays out 3, so without it almost every team since 1999–00 reads as lucky. What is left is the points a team banked above or below its goal margin: positive means winning more of the close and overtime games than goal difference alone predicts.