Franchise History
Standings by Year
Final NHL standings as of the last day of the regular season, for any year on record. View by Division, Conference, or League, and track where Buffalo (and every other team) stood across a season with the trend chart below.
2003–04 Final Standings
2003–04 Game ResultsBuffalo finished 18th in the league, 5th in the Northeast.
| Team | GP | W | L | OTL | T | PTS ▾ | PTS% | GF | GA | SOW | SOL | DIFF | xPTS | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | p-Detroit Red Wings | 82 | 48 | 21 | 2 | 11 | 109 | .665 | 255 | 189 | – | – | +66 | 106 | L1 |
| 2 | z-Tampa Bay Lightning | 82 | 46 | 22 | 6 | 8 | 106 | .646 | 245 | 192 | – | – | +53 | 102 | L1 |
| 3 | y-San Jose Sharks | 82 | 43 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 104 | .634 | 219 | 183 | – | – | +36 | 97 | W1 |
| 4 | y-Boston Bruins | 82 | 41 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 104 | .634 | 209 | 188 | – | – | +21 | 91 | W1 |
| 5 | x-Toronto Maple Leafs | 82 | 45 | 24 | 3 | 10 | 103 | .628 | 242 | 204 | – | – | +38 | 96 | W3 |
| 6 | x-Ottawa Senators | 82 | 43 | 23 | 6 | 10 | 102 | .622 | 262 | 189 | – | – | +73 | 108 | L1 |
| 7 | y-Vancouver Canucks | 82 | 43 | 24 | 5 | 10 | 101 | .616 | 235 | 194 | – | – | +41 | 98 | W6 |
| 8 | y-Philadelphia Flyers | 82 | 40 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 101 | .616 | 229 | 186 | – | – | +43 | 99 | T1 |
| 9 | x-New Jersey Devils | 82 | 43 | 25 | 2 | 12 | 100 | .610 | 213 | 164 | – | – | +49 | 103 | L1 |
| 10 | x-Colorado Avalanche | 82 | 40 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 100 | .610 | 236 | 198 | – | – | +38 | 96 | OT1 |
| 11 | x-Dallas Stars | 82 | 41 | 26 | 2 | 13 | 97 | .591 | 194 | 175 | – | – | +19 | 90 | W1 |
| 12 | x-Calgary Flames | 82 | 42 | 30 | 3 | 7 | 94 | .573 | 200 | 176 | – | – | +24 | 92 | L1 |
| 13 | x-Montréal Canadiens | 82 | 41 | 30 | 4 | 7 | 93 | .567 | 208 | 192 | – | – | +16 | 89 | W1 |
| 14 | x-St. Louis Blues | 82 | 39 | 30 | 2 | 11 | 91 | .555 | 191 | 198 | – | – | -7 | 79 | L1 |
| 15 | x-New York Islanders | 82 | 38 | 29 | 4 | 11 | 91 | .555 | 237 | 210 | – | – | +27 | 92 | T1 |
| 16 | x-Nashville Predators | 82 | 38 | 29 | 4 | 11 | 91 | .555 | 216 | 217 | – | – | -1 | 82 | W1 |
| 17 | Edmonton Oilers | 82 | 36 | 29 | 5 | 12 | 89 | .543 | 221 | 208 | – | – | +13 | 87 | L1 |
| 18 | Buffalo Sabres | 82 | 37 | 34 | 4 | 7 | 85 | .518 | 220 | 221 | – | – | -1 | 82 | L2 |
| 19 | Minnesota Wild | 82 | 30 | 29 | 3 | 20 | 83 | .506 | 188 | 183 | – | – | +5 | 84 | W3 |
| 20 | Los Angeles Kings | 82 | 28 | 29 | 9 | 16 | 81 | .494 | 205 | 217 | – | – | -12 | 77 | OT1 |
| 21 | Atlanta Thrashers | 82 | 33 | 37 | 4 | 8 | 78 | .476 | 214 | 243 | – | – | -29 | 72 | W1 |
| 22 | Anaheim Ducks | 82 | 29 | 35 | 8 | 10 | 76 | .463 | 184 | 213 | – | – | -29 | 70 | W1 |
| 23 | Carolina Hurricanes | 82 | 28 | 34 | 6 | 14 | 76 | .463 | 172 | 209 | – | – | -37 | 66 | T1 |
| 24 | Florida Panthers | 82 | 28 | 35 | 4 | 15 | 75 | .457 | 188 | 221 | – | – | -33 | 69 | T1 |
| 25 | New York Rangers | 82 | 27 | 40 | 8 | 7 | 69 | .421 | 206 | 250 | – | – | -44 | 66 | W1 |
| 26 | Phoenix Coyotes | 82 | 22 | 36 | 6 | 18 | 68 | .415 | 188 | 245 | – | – | -57 | 61 | W1 |
| 27 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 82 | 25 | 45 | 4 | 8 | 62 | .378 | 177 | 238 | – | – | -61 | 58 | W1 |
| 28 | Washington Capitals | 82 | 23 | 46 | 3 | 10 | 59 | .360 | 186 | 253 | – | – | -67 | 58 | L1 |
| 29 | Chicago Blackhawks | 82 | 20 | 43 | 8 | 11 | 59 | .360 | 188 | 259 | – | – | -71 | 57 | L1 |
| 30 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 82 | 23 | 47 | 4 | 8 | 58 | .354 | 190 | 303 | – | – | -113 | 46 | W2 |
x - clinched playoff spot, y - clinched division, z - clinched conference, p - clinched Presidents' Trophy.
xPTS is the points a team’s goals for and against project: the Pythagorean win estimate GF² / (GF² + GA²), scaled to points as win% × 2 × games played. It follows the current pace on any “as of” date. +/-xPTS is real points minus xPTS, after removing each team’s overtime-loss points. That step matters because xPTS splits a flat 2 points per game, while an overtime game pays out 3, so without it almost every team since 1999–00 reads as lucky. What is left is the points a team banked above or below its goal margin: positive means winning more of the close and overtime games than goal difference alone predicts.