@ PIT (Oct 29, 2015)@ NYI (Nov 1, 2015) ›

October 30, 2015

First Niagara Center | Buffalo

PHI 13 BUF

FINAL

Head-to-Head vs PHI all-time
1ST2ND3RDT
PHI0011
BUF1113
Shots on goal PHI 28, BUF 36W L. UllmarkL M. Neuvirth
Summary

Shot attempts were even in all situations; Buffalo won 3-1.

IN NET
Buffalo L. Ullmark .964
PHI M. Neuvirth .917
POWER PLAY
Buffalo 1 of 6
PHI 0 of 4
TURNING POINT
J. Eichel goal (P1 19:24), Sabres win chance rises from 52% to 73%
WIN DNA
2 of 4 winning traits
SHIFTS
Buffalo pinned 1:33 at 5v5 (typical 0:53)
Game Leaders
R. O'Reilly
3 (1G-2A)
POINTS
R. O'Reilly
2.4
GAME SCORE
J. Eichel
6
SHOTS
R. O'Reilly
26:03
TOI (F)
R. Ristolainen
23:49
TOI (D)
L. Ullmark
.964 (27/28)
SAVE %

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFPHI

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-PHI.
 1ST2ND3RDTotal
Faceoffs Won11-1311-914-1136-33
Hits7-75-87-619-21
Takeaways2-13-01-06-1
Giveaways0-13-22-05-3
PDO (5v5): BUF 1.058PHI 0.942. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

P3 20:00
+27+140-14-27shot attemptsBUFPHI

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 52%.

P3 20:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFPHI
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P1 19:24J. Eichel (4) 52% to 73%+21
  2. P2 04:20R. O'Reilly (4), power play 77% to 89%+12
  3. P2 09:20Fighting on Marcus Foligno, 5 min 91% to 85%-6
  4. P2 09:20Fighting on Luke Schenn, 5 min 85% to 91%+6

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value comes from both teams' goals for and against to that date, regressed toward the league average early in a season, plus home ice.

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

Replay
P3 19:48
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

2 of 4 winning traits showed up tonight. Win rates are over the full 2015–16 regular season (82 games).

Wins (35)Losses (47, 11 in overtime or a shootout)This game
3+ scorersD combined 3+ ptsScored firstDepth goal50%100%
Yes
3+ different scorers
Sabres win 83% when yes, 19% when no
No
Defensemen combined for 3+ points
Sabres win 63% when yes, 37% when no
Yes
Scored first
Sabres win 60% when yes, 30% when no
No
Depth forward scored
Sabres win 62% when yes, 27% when no

Shift Rhythm

Buffalo was pinned for 1:33 at 5v5, well above the typical 0:53 a game, and gave up 3 shot attempts in that time.

R. O'Reilly was out for 1:06 of it, the most on the team.

Buffalo sent skaters back out on short rest 36 times, well above the typical 22 a game.

BUFPHITypical game, 2025–26
Pinned time (5v5)1:330:360:53
Shot attempts against while pinned301
Short-rest shifts361722

When Buffalo was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P111:19 to 11:440:2510
P115:03 to 15:050:0200
P21:00 to 1:190:1920
P27:03 to 7:420:3900
P38:35 to 8:430:0800

When Philadelphia was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P27:52 to 7:570:0500
P210:20 to 10:390:1900
P211:14 to 11:230:0900
P38:40 to 8:430:0300
How this is measured

Pinned. A team is pinned when 3 or more of its skaters on the ice are past a minute of unbroken play, at 5v5. A hemmed-in shift is an even-strength shift in which the unit was on for more than 1:00 without a whistle to change on, and stayed at even strength for most of it. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. Only the time past the minute counts: the first minute of those shifts plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the pinned team is defending (in 2025–26, a pinned team took 24% of the shot attempts; pinned time was 1.9% of all 5v5 play). Pinned time is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Short rest. An even-strength shift a skater started after less than 45 seconds on the bench, same period only (an intermission is a full rest).

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2025–26 regular season, counting both teams (164 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. This season has no measured row yet, so 2025–26 stands in. A sentence at the top only appears when a number is among the highest fifth of those, or when a goal went in while a team was pinned.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is pinned and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

30 shifts, averaging 0:52. 3 hemmed-in, 2 after a short rest, 1:06 pinned.

Replay
Shift 30
Hemmed-in shiftShort rest before itGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:46P2avg 0:49P3avg 0:500:000:301:001:302:002:30151015202530Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2025–26: 0:45, 0:50 (the long change), 0:47.

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
O'Reilly–Foligno–Deslauriers16:58103730.0%-13.7%3532
Larsson–Reinhart–Eichel15:11002625.0%-18.8%2616
Gionta–Moulson–Girgensons14:45004266.7%25.2%2111
Legwand–McGinn–Schaller12:49002433.3%-9.8%1202
Gionta–O'Reilly–Girgensons12:03002166.7%24.6%1101
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
Gorges–Ristolainen111:510051033.3%-10.6%4523
Franson–McCabe111:482011664.7%25.4%8584
Colaiacovo–Pysyk111:3200111837.9%-6.1%913611
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1R. O'ReillyBUF | C1G 2A 3P
2J. EichelBUF | C1G 0A 1P
3N. DeslauriersBUF | LW1G 0A 1P

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
SOG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGS
#90 R. O'Reilly (C)
1
2
3
+2
2
3
14:1439.1%-8.6%50.0%100.0%1.333
2.4
26:03
#12 B. Gionta (RW)
0
1
1
0
0
3
9:4771.4%+33.7%66.7%1.000
1.2
18:20
#15 J. Eichel (C)
1
0
1
+1
0
6
8:3937.5%-9.6%42.9%100.0%1.200
1.2
17:23
#22 J. Larsson (LW)
0
1
1
+1
0
5
6:2553.8%+11.3%50.0%100.0%1.200
1.1
13:11
#44 N. Deslauriers (LW)
1
0
1
+1
2
3
12:3445.0%+0.3%60.0%100.0%1.111
1.1
14:52
#82 M. Foligno (LW)
0
1
1
+1
7
0
10:3123.8%-30.5%35.7%100.0%1.200
0.1
11:34
#46 C. Franson (D)
0
1
1
+2
0
2
12:3557.9%+18.3%61.5%100.0%1.250
1.2
20:47
#17 D. Legwand (C)
0
0
0
0
0
3
7:1933.3%-14.7%36.4%1.000
0.0
10:24
#23 S. Reinhart (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
9:3044.4%-0.5%46.7%0.0%0.875
-0.2
13:54
#26 M. Moulson (LW)
0
0
0
-1
0
1
7:5850.0%+6.1%42.9%0.0%0.667
-0.1
12:12
#28 Z. Girgensons (C)
0
0
0
0
0
2
10:2468.8%+31.5%72.7%1.000
0.9
20:27
#59 T. Schaller (LW)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
7:0233.3%-15.6%30.0%0.0%0.800
-0.4
7:14
#88 J. McGinn (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
2
7:1446.7%+2.4%62.5%1.000
0.3
10:22
#3 M. Pysyk (D)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
11:5836.7%-14.7%39.1%0.0%0.917
-0.5
15:10
#4 J. Gorges (D)
0
0
0
0
15
1
12:2241.2%-4.8%54.5%1.000
0.1
20:26
#25 C. Colaiacovo (D)
0
0
0
0
0
2
12:4837.5%-13.9%43.5%1.000
0.1
16:05
#29 J. McCabe (D)
0
0
0
+1
2
1
12:2165.0%+28.8%62.5%66.7%1.022
0.6
17:14
#55 R. Ristolainen (D)
0
0
0
0
0
2
12:2544.4%-0.5%58.3%1.000
0.2
23:49
Total
3
6
9
28
36
9.2

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOIDec
#35 L. Ullmark281.9642.059:47W

Team Stats

PHIBUF
28Shots on Goal36
5.3%Shooting % (5v5)11.1%
.889Save % (5v5).947
0.942PDO (5v5)1.058
33 (48%)Faceoffs Won36 (52%)
4Power Play Chances6
0%PP%17%
83%PK%100%
0PPG1
31Penalty Minutes30
21Hits19
11Blocked Shots22
3Giveaways5
1Takeaways6

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
19:24GOAL (BUF): Jack Eichel (4), assists: Ryan O'Reilly, Johan Larsson
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
04:20GOAL (BUF): Ryan O'Reilly (4), assists: Brian Gionta, Cody Franson(PP)
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
03:12GOAL (BUF): Nicolas Deslauriers (3), assists: Ryan O'Reilly, Marcus Foligno
16:34GOAL (PHI): Mark Streit (3), assists: R.J. Umberger, Sam Gagner
20:00Period end
20:00Game end
@ PIT (Oct 29, 2015)@ NYI (Nov 1, 2015) ›