@ NYR (Apr 25, 2021)@ BOS (Apr 29, 2021) ›

April 27, 2021

Madison Square Garden | New York

BUF 13 NYR

FINAL

Head-to-Head vs NYR all-time
1ST2ND3RDT
BUF0101
NYR0123
Shots on goal BUF 37, NYR 41W I. ShesterkinL U. Luukkonen
Summary

NYR had the better expected goals in all situations and won 3-1.

FINISHING
Buffalo 1 goal on 3.98 xG
NYR 3 goals on 5.00 xG
IN NET
Buffalo U. Luukkonen .927 (+1.4 GSAx)
NYR I. Shesterkin .973 (+3.0 GSAx)
POWER PLAY
Buffalo 1 of 2
NYR 1 of 3
TURNING POINT
A. Lafrenière goal (P3 9:49), Sabres win chance drops from 41% to 10%
BEST LINE
Sheahan–Rieder–Caggiula, 75.7% of 5v5 xG
BEST PAIR
Ristolainen–Samuelsson, 86.3% of 5v5 xG
WIN DNA
2 of 8 winning traits
Game Leaders
S. Reinhart
1 (1G)
POINTS
S. Reinhart
1.4
GAME SCORE
T. Rieder
6
SHOTS
T. Rieder
0.61
XG
S. Reinhart
20:06
TOI (F)
R. Dahlin
24:05
TOI (D)
U. Luukkonen
.927 (38/41)
SAVE %
Game Control
BUFNYRBUF shareNYR share
5-on-5
Expected goals3.492.4958.4%41.6%
Shot attempts534753.0%47.0%
Shot attempts, score-adjusted52.647.352.7%47.3%
High-danger chances10952.6%47.4%
Power play
Goals, of chances1 of 2 (50%)1 of 3 (33%)
Expected goals0.331.8815.0%85.0%
Shot attempts51821.7%78.3%
High-danger chances1614.3%85.7%
All situations
Expected goals3.985.0044.3%55.7%
Shot attempts626648.4%51.6%
High-danger chances111640.7%59.3%

The Sabres had the better 5-on-5 chances, NYR the better chances in all situations.

How this is measured

Shot attempts include missed and blocked shots. Expected goals (xG) weigh each unblocked shot by its chance of going in; high-danger is 0.12 xG or more. Power-play goals and chances are the NHL's line, which counts a double minor as two chances and a 5-on-3 from two penalties as two, so the count can run above the number of penalties in the Full Game Log below. Score-adjusted is the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Best line and pair: among units with a winning 5-on-5 xG share, at least 2:00 together (4:00 for a pair) and 0.25 xG in those minutes (half that where a goal was scored in them), one that came out ahead on the goals scored and allowed with it out ranks first; the rest is the best mix of that share and those goals, weighted two to one.

Sheahan–Rieder–CaggiulaBEST LINE

75.7% of xG (0.83 to 0.27), 12-7 on attempts in 9:09 together.

Ristolainen–SamuelssonBEST D PAIR

86.3% of xG (0.99 to 0.16), 14-15 on attempts in 14:11 together.

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFNYR

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-NYR.
 1ST2ND3RDTotal
Faceoffs Won10-58-129-1027-27
Hits6-103-64-913-25
Takeaways3-22-23-28-6
Giveaways2-43-34-19-8
PDO (5v5): BUF 0.939NYR 1.061. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

P3 20:00
+16+80-8-16shot attemptsBUFNYR

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 31%.

P3 20:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFNYR
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P3 09:49A. Lafrenière (10) 41% to 10%-31
  2. P2 19:56S. Reinhart (22), power play 17% to 38%+21
  3. P2 02:22B. Smith (5) 35% to 17%-18
  4. P3 06:57Fighting on Dylan Cozens, 5 min 59% to 46%-13

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value comes from both teams' goals for and against to that date, regressed toward the league average early in a season, plus home ice.

Expected Goals

Cumulative xG from the game. What is xG?

BUF 3.98xGNYR 5.00
P3 20:00
0246123

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

xG range
Replay
P3 19:03
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

2 of 8 winning traits showed up tonight. Win rates are over the full 2020–21 regular season (56 games).

Wins (15)Losses (41, 7 in overtime or a shootout)This game
3+ scorersxG share 50%+, allGoalie > xGD combined 3+ ptsScored firstMore HD chances, allShot qualityDepth goal50%100%
No
3+ different scorers
Sabres win 52% when yes, 9% when no
No
xG share 50%+ (all situations)
Sabres win 56% when yes, 15% when no
Yes
Goalie beat expected
Sabres win 46% when yes, 7% when no
No
Defensemen combined for 3+ points
Sabres win 53% when yes, 17% when no
No
Scored first
Sabres win 42% when yes, 19% when no
No
More high-danger chances (all situations)
too few games to split
Yes
Better shot quality than opponent
Sabres win 38% when yes, 15% when no
No
Depth forward scored
Sabres win 43% when yes, 8% when no

Shift Rhythm

Nothing in either team's shifts stood out: pinned time, short rest were all close to a typical game this season.

BUFNYRTypical game, 2020–21
Pinned time (5v5)1:391:380:57
Shot attempts against while pinned332
Short-rest shifts81717
xG against, skaters 40+ seconds into a shift50%29%

When Buffalo was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P113:31 to 13:340:0300
P118:59 to 19:040:0500
P213:10 to 13:110:0100
P213:15 to 13:190:0400
P214:19 to 15:130:5430

When New York was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P111:05 to 11:060:01
A. Fox 1:06
00
P114:28 to 14:340:0600
P118:59 to 19:000:0100
P21:00 to 1:060:06
A. Fox 1:06
10
P27:13 to 7:140:01
A. Fox 1:22
00
How this is measured

Pinned. A team is pinned when 3 or more of its skaters on the ice are past a minute of unbroken play, at 5v5. A hemmed-in shift is an even-strength shift in which the unit was on for more than 1:00 without a whistle to change on, and stayed at even strength for most of it. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. Only the time past the minute counts: the first minute of those shifts plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the pinned team is defending (in 2020–21, a pinned team took 28% of the shot attempts; pinned time was 2.4% of all 5v5 play). Pinned time is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Short rest. An even-strength shift a skater started after less than 45 seconds on the bench, same period only (an intermission is a full rest).

Tired legs. Every shot attempt is tagged by how far into their shifts the defending skaters were, on average, at that moment (goalies left out). The row is the share of xG against that came with them 40 seconds or more in. xG covers goals, shots on goal and misses. Shots are counted from the play-by-play.

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2020–21 regular season, counting both teams (112 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. A sentence at the top only appears when a number is among the highest fifth of those, or when a goal went in while a team was pinned.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is pinned and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

23 shifts, averaging 1:00. 1 hemmed-in, 1 after a short rest, 0:03 pinned.

Replay
Shift 23
Hemmed-in shiftShort rest before itGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:53P2avg 0:54P3avg 1:190:001:002:003:004:001510152023Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2020–21: 0:46, 0:49 (the long change), 0:48.

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIxGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Skinner–Reinhart–Olofsson113:010.680.9940.6%00181456.3%3.6%-22.3%1313108
Asplund–Thompson–Mittelstadt111:540.510.6046.3%0091242.9%-11.6%-14.6%811610
Sheahan–Rieder–Caggiula19:090.830.2775.7%0012763.2%11.0%18.1%9685
Bjork–Cozens–Ruotsalainen17:100.640.1283.9%017750.0%-3.5%26.3%6656
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIxGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Jokiharju–Dahlin118:260.631.1635.2%00181554.5%1.5%-29.0%15141111
Ristolainen–Samuelsson114:110.990.1686.3%00141548.3%-5.8%30.1%81189
Borgen–Bryson112:230.850.6656.6%01121250.0%-3.7%-3.3%101189
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1I. ShesterkinNYR | G1.01 GAA, .973 SV%
2B. SmithNYR | D1G 0A 1P
3A. LafrenièreNYR | LW1G 0A 1P

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
SOG
ixG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGS
#23 S. Reinhart (C)
1
0
1
0
0
3
0.50
+0.5
15:2043.8%-23.0%55.6%+4.0%50.0%1.000
1.01.4
20:06
#37 C. Mittelstadt (C)
0
1
1
0
0
3
0.29
-0.3
13:5356.7%-3.4%44.0%-12.0%45.5%1.000
1.00.8
18:00
#13 T. Rieder (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
6
0.61
-0.6
9:4175.3%+20.1%60.0%+8.8%56.3%1.000
1.20.7
9:41
#15 R. Sheahan (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
1
0.19
-0.2
11:1568.1%+12.0%58.3%+7.0%52.6%0.0%0.857
0.50.1
15:38
#24 D. Cozens (C)
0
0
0
-1
5
0
8:4283.9%+28.7%50.0%-3.5%50.0%0.0%0.833
0.1-0.1
9:11
#25 A. Ruotsalainen (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
2
0.46
-0.5
9:5486.3%+32.3%58.8%+7.0%53.8%0.0%0.833
0.70.2
10:33
#53 J. Skinner (LW)
0
0
0
0
2
6
0.50
-0.5
14:5439.8%-28.4%51.4%-2.4%46.4%1.000
0.70.3
17:15
#68 V. Olofsson (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
3
0.12
-0.1
14:2340.6%-27.0%55.9%+4.4%50.0%1.000
0.50.4
19:04
#72 T. Thompson (C)
0
0
0
0
2
4
0.48
-0.5
14:4949.8%-12.2%44.0%-12.0%42.9%1.000
0.40.0
16:50
#74 R. Asplund (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
1
0.08
-0.1
15:2654.3%-7.2%46.4%-9.1%45.8%0.0%0.917
0.1-0.2
16:05
#91 D. Caggiula (LW)
0
0
0
0
2
1
0.13
-0.1
12:0182.4%+32.4%64.0%+14.7%60.0%1.000
0.70.4
13:12
#96 A. Bjork (LW)
0
0
0
-2
0
3
0.17
-0.2
8:4566.7%+9.1%47.1%-7.2%42.9%0.0%0.750
0.4-0.1
12:57
#3 W. Borgen (D)
0
0
0
-2
0
0
0.01
0.0
14:5659.3%+0.1%50.0%-4.3%48.1%0.0%0.833
0.1-0.2
15:12
#10 H. Jokiharju (D)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0.04
0.0
19:4432.3%-42.1%52.9%-0.1%50.0%0.0%0.917
0.0-0.1
21:12
#26 R. Dahlin (D)
0
0
0
0
0
2
0.29
-0.3
20:1350.7%-15.4%57.5%+7.5%55.6%1.000
0.70.5
24:05
#54 M. Samuelsson (D)
0
0
0
0
0
0
14:2588.1%+38.3%51.6%-2.0%47.6%1.000
0.30.2
19:27
#55 R. Ristolainen (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.06
-0.1
16:1583.6%+32.4%50.0%-4.7%41.7%1.000
0.30.1
23:06
#78 J. Bryson (D)
0
0
0
-1
0
1
0.05
0.0
13:4960.3%+1.6%55.2%+3.1%50.0%0.0%0.889
0.30.1
15:14
Total
1
1
2
11
37
3.98
4.4

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOIDec
#1 U. Luukkonen4134.4.927+1.41.657:47L

Team Stats

BUFNYR
37Shots on Goal41
0.0%Shooting % (5v5)6.1%
.939Save % (5v5)1.000
0.939PDO (5v5)1.061
27 (50%)Faceoffs Won27 (50%)
2Power Play Chances3
50%PP%33%
67%PK%50%
1PPG1
11Penalty Minutes9
13Hits25
7Blocked Shots16
9Giveaways8
8Takeaways6

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
02:22GOAL (NYR): Brendan Smith (5), unassistedxG 0.04
19:56GOAL (BUF): Sam Reinhart (22), assists: Casey Mittelstadt(PP)xG 0.19
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
09:49GOAL (NYR): Alexis Lafrenière (10), assists: Ryan Strome, Adam FoxxG 0.16
13:49GOAL (NYR): Mika Zibanejad (20), assists: Chris Kreider, Ryan Strome(PP)xG 0.09
20:00Period end
20:00Game end
@ NYR (Apr 25, 2021)@ BOS (Apr 29, 2021) ›