Tage Thompson#72

C with Buffalo, 2018–19 to 2025–26

No. 72Shoots RHeight 6'6"Weight 220 lbsBorn October 30, 1997Hometown Phoenix, AZ, USA
On-Ice Impact, 2025–26 5v5
48.7%
xGF% ON ICE
50.3%
CF% ON ICE

On-ice PDO 1.014 (5v5 on-ice shooting plus save percentage). PDO over one season is noisy, it regresses hard toward 1.000, so read it as recent puck luck rather than a skill.

Buffalo's 5v5 xGF% rose most with McLeod (+15.8) and fell most with Greenway (-23.4).

See the full teammate breakdown
Recent Form
Last 10
Last 20
Points
6 to 14
9Cold
17 
Individual xG
0.29 to 0.50
0.47Hot
0.38 
On-Ice xGF%
43.5% to 55.2%
55.2%Hot
51.9% 
Game Score
0.80 to 1.40
1.18Hot
1.02 

Each line is the metric's rolling 10-game value across the last 20 games, so it ends on the Last 10 figure. The dashed line is the player's season average (50% for On-Ice xGF%), with navy shading for time spent above it and gray for below. Gold ticks mark goal games. Descriptive only, small samples swing.

Career With Buffalo

488 games, 8 seasons
213
G
12th all-time
184
A
32nd all-time
397
PTS
16th all-time
226
PIM
84th all-time
17:17
TOI/G

All-time is the rank among the 529 skaters with a regular-season game for Buffalo since 1970–71. Ties share a rank.

Season by Season

Chart:
Drag to zoom

These stats don’t share a natural scale, so each line is normalized to its own 0-100% range for shape comparison. Hover a point for its real value.

0244720182019202020212022202320242025SeasonGoalsaging curve

The dashed line is a league-typical aging curve for a forward, scaled to this player's own level. Above it means producing more than a typical player that age; the line falling away faster than the curve means declining faster than the aging curve alone would explain.

SeasonAgeGPGAPTS+/-PIMPen +/-/60PPSHGWGSOGS%FO%TOI/GP/60ixGxG/60GAxCF%FF%GF%xG%PDO
2018–1920657512-2220-0.231001086.5%50.0%12:08
0.91
17th pct
9.5
0.73
52nd pct
-2.5
21st pct
47.1%
27th pct
46.7%29.2%40.1%0.957
2019–20*211000000.0000000.0%6:590.000.10.430.053.8%55.6%61.0%1.000
2020–21*22388614-6170.00200968.3%25.0%13:52
1.59
50th pct
11.1
1.26
97th pct
-3.1
16th pct
45.3%
19th pct
43.6%43.3%48.2%0.998
2021–222378383068-1737+0.09102425315.0%40.3%17:53
2.93
94th pct
28.1
1.21
94th pct
+10.0
98th pct
50.8%
78th pct
49.4%48.9%49.9%0.995
2022–232478474794+439+0.29201729515.9%43.1%18:35
3.89
100th pct
35.8
1.48
100th pct
+11.2
98th pct
53.5%
97th pct
52.4%53.5%49.8%1.012
2023–242571292756-143+0.1992324611.8%43.3%18:07
2.61
88th pct
26.9
1.26
95th pct
+2.1
79th pct
53.3%
88th pct
53.2%56.1%51.5%1.005
2024–252676442872-2350.0070624218.2%42.8%18:45
3.03
95th pct
28.0
1.18
92nd pct
+16.0
100th pct
51.0%
70th pct
51.4%54.5%51.7%1.017
2025–262781404181-635+0.4260527214.7%45.5%19:15
3.12
97th pct
35.4
1.36
99th pct
+4.6
91st pct
50.3%
59th pct
50.1%52.2%48.7%1.014
Total488213184397-5022655525151214.1%17:172.82

* Shortened season. Weigh its totals against a full 82-game year with that in mind.

pct under a P/60, xG/60, GAx and CF% figure is where that season ranks, as a percentile, among every Sabres forward season since 2016–17 with at least 12 games; a season under that floor isn't ranked. xG/60, GAx and CF% come from this site's own xG model and shift-chart reconstruction, not an NHL feed; P/60 is from official NHL totals. Higher is better throughout.

Actual vs Expected

One row per season: the gold dot is the expected total, the navy dot is what actually happened.

xGGoals
0132639522018–192018–19: 9.5 xG2018–19: 7 Goals (-2.5 vs expected)7 / 9.52019–202019–20: 0.1 xG2019–20: 0 Goals (0.0 vs expected)0 / 0.12020–212020–21: 11.1 xG2020–21: 8 Goals (-3.1 vs expected)8 / 11.12021–222021–22: 28.1 xG2021–22: 38 Goals (+10.0 vs expected)38 / 28.12022–232022–23: 35.8 xG2022–23: 47 Goals (+11.2 vs expected)47 / 35.82023–242023–24: 26.9 xG2023–24: 29 Goals (+2.1 vs expected)29 / 26.92024–252024–25: 28.0 xG2024–25: 44 Goals (+16.0 vs expected)44 / 28.02025–262025–26: 35.4 xG2025–26: 40 Goals (+4.6 vs expected)40 / 35.4

Shot Map

Every shot attempt across every season shown here, to scale, always attacking right. Pick one season to see that year alone, or leave it on Career for the full picture.

xG range
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

With or Without You

Buffalo's 5v5 shot-attempt (CF%) and expected-goal (xGF%) share with Thompson on the ice, split by whether each teammate was out there too. Δ is the with-minus-apart gap: a positive number means the pair drove play better together than Thompson did without that teammate. That gap is always measured from the named player's side, so the same pair can read positive on one player's table and negative on the other's. 2025–26 regular season, minimum 20:00 together. Together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice, so a pair's time and xGF% here differ slightly from the Line Combinations table, which counts only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit.

Teammate
TOGETHER
THOMPSON APART
IMPACT
TOI TogetherCF%xGF%CF%xGF%Δ CF%Δ xGF%
Tuch
584:0851.2%49.2%
49.4%48.1%
+1.8+1.1
Dahlin
501:1552.2%49.4%
48.8%48.0%
+3.4+1.4
Krebs
494:5751.3%52.3%
49.5%46.0%
+1.8+6.3
Samuelsson
467:3750.3%53.0%
50.3%45.6%
0.0+7.4
Byram
425:4449.6%47.1%
50.6%49.6%
-1.0-2.5
Power
417:1952.4%47.9%
49.1%49.1%
+3.3-1.2
Doan
365:4849.0%47.8%
50.9%49.1%
-1.9-1.3
Benson
331:1753.5%48.8%
49.0%48.6%
+4.5+0.2
Timmins
162:4845.4%42.0%
51.1%49.7%
-5.7-7.7
Kesselring
112:1648.7%46.8%
50.5%48.9%
-1.8-2.1
Kulich
110:1950.4%42.2%
50.3%49.2%
+0.1-7.0
Metsa
98:1046.4%49.9%
50.6%48.5%
-4.2+1.4
Bryson
83:0843.1%47.5%
50.7%48.7%
-7.6-1.2
Ostlund
77:4054.9%59.4%
50.0%48.1%
+4.9+11.3
McLeod
64:4744.5%63.5%
50.6%47.7%
-6.1+15.8
Quinn
62:1545.0%46.1%
50.6%48.8%
-5.6-2.7
Zucker
61:1445.0%36.9%
50.6%49.4%
-5.6-12.5
Norris
51:3157.5%45.9%
49.9%48.8%
+7.6-2.9
Stanley
47:5048.9%32.5%
50.3%49.0%
-1.4-16.5
Greenway
39:4936.5%26.4%
50.7%49.8%
-14.2-23.4
Kozak
32:5842.0%32.0%
50.5%49.0%
-8.5-17.0
Malenstyn
25:4643.2%44.6%
50.4%48.7%
-7.2-4.1

Shift Rhythm Profile

How Thompson's shift length lines up with on-ice results, 2025–26 regular season. A shift under 0:30 is a quick change, usually right off a whistle. 0:30 to 0:45 is a short shift and 0:45 to 1:00 a typical one. 1:00 or more is a long shift, more likely during a delayed line change, a d-zone lockdown, or a penalty kill that ran long. Shift length is an outcome before it is a cause: a shift runs long because the unit could not change. Most of a long shift is ordinary play, though; the stretch past the one-minute mark is where a unit is really pinned, and each game page counts that time on its own. Empty-net goals against are left out.

219 of 490 of Thompson's shifts over a minute were hemmed-in shifts (mostly even strength, more than 60 seconds of unbroken play).

Shift LengthShiftsCF%xG%GFGA
Quick (<0:30)30044.4%52.2%3523
Short (0:30-0:45)52854.2%59.7%3921
Typical (0:45-1:00)53852.3%52.0%1313
Long (1:00+)49065.9%70.6%2710
0:50
AVG SHIFT
168
PP SHIFTS
99
PK SHIFTS
+5s
LONG-CHANGE GAP
219
HEMMED-IN SHIFTS
87
SHORT-REST SHIFTS