vs CHI (Oct 3, 2026) ›

October 1, 2026

Nationwide Arena | Columbus

BUF 3 – 6 CBJ

FINAL

Head-to-Head vs CBJ all-time
1ST2ND3RDT
BUF1203
CBJ3126
Shots on goal BUF 26, CBJ 23W J. GreavesL U. Luukkonen
Game Leaders
2.1
GAME SCORE
20:46
TOI (F)
25:58
TOI (D)
.773 (17/22)
SAVE %

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P ▾
+/-
PIM
SOG
ixG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
Special Teams
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGFxGAxGF%xGF% RelCFCACF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGSPP ShiftsPP TOIPP SharePK ShiftsPK TOIPK Share
#86 N. Ostlund (C)
0
2
2
+1
0
3
0.36
-0.4
12:470.440.1871.3%+29.8%15671.4%+19.3%78.6%66.7%0.286
2.22.1
12:1933.6%10:3520.2%
16:42
#25 O. Power (D)
0
2
2
+2
0
0
–
–
20:110.760.5259.4%+21.9%191359.4%+2.6%64.0%66.7%0.976
1.71.9
21:5427.5%21:4761.8%
25:25
#6 Z. Benson (LW)
0
1
1
-1
0
1
0.31
-0.3
13:170.460.1872.3%+31.6%15671.4%+19.3%78.6%50.0%0.143
1.51.3
34:3065.2%10:3117.9%
18:34
#22 J. Quinn (RW)
1
0
1
-1
0
4
0.48
+0.5
13:530.460.1872.3%+31.6%15575.0%+24.0%78.6%50.0%0.143
1.51.9
24:4568.8%21:0738.7%
20:46
#71 R. McLeod (C)
0
1
1
0
0
0
–
–
12:220.180.5624.1%-36.5%61233.3%-33.3%23.1%100.0%1.500
0.30.5
32:0730.7%11:1342.2%
16:41
#94 K. Helenius (C)
1
0
1
+2
0
2
0.14
+0.9
12:020.080.4614.4%-45.0%51131.3%-34.8%18.2%100.0%2.000
-0.10.8
32:2635.3%00:000.0%
15:09
#23 M. Samuelsson (D)
1
0
1
-2
4
1
0.05
+1.0
16:400.380.6437.2%-21.1%141253.8%-6.6%40.0%0.0%0.750
-0.10.3
00:000.0%00:000.0%
18:21
#9 J. Norris (C)
0
0
0
+1
0
1
0.10
-0.1
12:040.610.4159.7%+18.2%16769.6%+17.4%64.7%100.0%1.125
0.70.7
12:1432.4%11:2649.7%
16:19
#10 S. Carrick (C)
0
0
0
-2
0
0
0.00
0.0
7:210.040.1621.6%-30.3%3537.5%-23.2%50.0%0.0%0.000
-0.1-0.4
00:000.0%10:2212.7%
7:43
#19 P. Krebs (C)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.06
-0.1
13:570.040.467.1%-53.2%51229.4%-37.9%16.7%–1.000
-0.4-0.4
10:102.4%00:000.0%
14:58
#20 J. Kulich (C)
0
0
0
-2
0
1
0.04
0.0
8:010.070.1629.2%-22.2%4450.0%-9.0%57.1%0.0%0.000
0.1-0.2
00:000.0%00:000.0%
8:45
#29 B. Malenstyn (LW)
0
0
0
-2
0
1
0.01
0.0
7:390.040.1621.6%-30.3%3442.9%-16.8%50.0%0.0%0.000
0.1-0.2
00:000.0%10:3218.5%
8:11
#72 T. Thompson (C)
0
0
0
0
2
4
0.64
-0.6
14:260.590.3165.5%+26.0%17770.8%+19.7%66.7%–1.000
1.20.6
34:2564.0%00:000.0%
19:46
#91 J. Doan (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
3
0.36
-0.4
13:400.590.4158.9%+16.5%17868.0%+15.7%63.2%–1.000
1.00.7
44:2864.7%00:000.0%
19:06
#24 M. Grzelcyk (D)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
–
–
12:370.000.110.0%-51.8%6746.2%-14.6%50.0%0.0%–
0.0-0.1
00:000.0%11:0638.2%
14:27
#26 R. Dahlin (D)
0
0
0
-1
0
4
0.24
-0.2
19:560.450.7138.9%-20.6%181260.0%+3.6%50.0%0.0%0.857
0.70.4
35:1275.4%00:000.0%
25:58
#46 L. Crevier (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.02
0.0
13:440.640.3068.3%+31.4%14960.9%+4.3%66.7%50.0%0.758
0.50.4
00:000.0%21:4862.4%
16:14
#73 Z. Metsa (D)
0
0
0
-1
5
0
–
–
10:490.040.1321.6%-29.7%8561.5%+4.4%62.5%–1.000
0.20.3
00:000.0%11:0537.6%
12:54
Total
3
6
9
11
26
2.80
10.5
6:542:53

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice. On-ice xG counts shots on goal only, where a team's xG and a skater's own ixG also count missed shots.

PP TOI and PK TOI are a skater's time on the ice during his team's power plays and penalty kills. PP Share and PK Share are that time as a part of the team's power-play or penalty-kill time (the Total row). PP Shifts and PK Shifts count shifts that began in that state.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOI ▾Dec
#1 U. Luukkonen2252.3.773-2.7-2.059:08L
Game Control
BUFCBJBUF shareCBJ share
5-on-5
Expected goals1.611.5351.2%48.8%
Shot attempts402958.0%42.0%
Shot attempts, score-adjusted38.829.556.8%43.2%
High-danger chances4450.0%50.0%
Power play
Goals, of chances0 of 5 (0%)2 of 3 (67%)
Expected goals1.040.6561.5%38.5%
Shot attempts14766.7%33.3%
High-danger chances3260.0%40.0%
Shorthanded expected goals0.100.0283.8%16.2%
All situations
Expected goals2.802.7350.6%49.4%
Shot attempts563958.9%41.1%
High-danger chances7750.0%50.0%
How this is measured

Shot attempts include missed and blocked shots. Expected goals (xG) weigh each unblocked shot by its chance of going in; high-danger is 0.12 xG or more. Power-play goals and chances are the NHL's line where it publishes one (otherwise the play-by-play's stretches of man-advantage time), which counts a double minor as two chances and a 5-on-3 from two penalties as two, so the count can run above the number of penalties in the Full Game Log below. Score-adjusted is the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site.

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFCBJ

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-CBJ.
 1ST2ND3RDTotal
Faceoffs Won8-178-813-1129-36
Hits12-115-84-621-25
Takeaways1-20-31-12-6
Giveaways5-56-54-315-13
PDO (5v5): BUF 0.891CBJ 1.109. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

Tied for only 12 minutes, too few for a score-tied view.

P3 20:00
BUF5639CBJshot attempts
+21+110-11-21shot attemptsBUFCBJ

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 47%.

P3 20:00
BUF0%100%CBJchance of winning
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUF
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P1 12:51C. Sillinger (1) 66% to 47%-19
  2. P1 07:21M. Samuelsson (1) 46% to 64%+18
  3. P1 17:58M. Knies (1), power play 45% to 27%-18
  4. P2 13:14K. Helenius (1) 9% to 23%+14

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value is home ice alone.

Expected Goals

Cumulative xG from the game. What is xG?

P3 20:00
BUF2.802.73CBJexpected goals
0123123
Most expected goals, by skater
BUFxGGCBJxGG
T. Thompson0.640M. Olivier0.711
J. Quinn0.481M. Knies0.602
N. Ostlund0.360C. Sillinger0.451
J. Doan0.360D. Heinen0.250
Z. Benson0.310S. Monahan0.241

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

xG range
Replay
P3 19:44
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Shift Rhythm

Neither team spent an unusual amount of time on long shifts.

BUFCBJTypical game, 2025–26
Time on long shifts (5v5)0:210:270:53
Shot attempts against in that time001

Goals and shift length

How long the scored-on skaters had been on the ice.

PeriodClockScored byPast 1:00Longest
P17:21BUF0 of 4A. Fantilli 0:41
P112:51CBJ0 of 5N. Ostlund 0:54
P117:58CBJ PP0 of 4L. Crevier 0:55
P118:44CBJ0 of 5B. Malenstyn 0:04
P21:25BUF0 of 5A. Fantilli 0:57
P27:45CBJ0 of 5B. Malenstyn 0:21
P213:14BUF3 of 5D. Heinen 1:17
P314:21CBJ PP2 of 4M. Grzelcyk 1:06

When Buffalo was on long shifts

PeriodClockPast 1:00Skaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P210:40 to 10:560:1600
How this is measured

Long shift. A skater who stepped on at even strength and stayed out for 1:00 or more of unbroken play, mostly at even strength. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. A team is on long shifts at 5v5 when 3 or more of its skaters are past that minute, and only the time past the minute counts: the first minute plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the team is defending (in 2025–26, a team on long shifts took 24% of the shot attempts in that time, which was 1.9% of all 5v5 play). Time on long shifts is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Goals. Each goal lists the skaters it was scored on and how long each had been out, with the same unbroken play clock. Power-play goals count too, though a penalty kill unit runs long by design. Empty-net and shootout goals are left out. Stretches under 0:15 with no shot attempt or goal against are not listed, though their time is in the totals.

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2025–26 regular season, counting both teams (164 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. This season has no measured row yet, so 2025–26 stands in. A sentence at the top only appears when time on long shifts is at least 0:30 and among the highest fifth of those, or when a 5v5 goal went in with 3 or more of the scored-on team's skaters past the minute.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is on a long shift and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

28 shifts, averaging 0:56. 4 were long shifts.

Replay
Shift 28
Long shiftGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:41P2avg 1:06P3avg 0:570:000:301:001:302:002:30151015202528Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2025–26: 0:45, 0:50 (the long change), 0:47.

Rasmus Dahlin by period

On ice, all situations. xG counts shots on goal. EV Avg counts shifts that started at even strength.

PeriodShiftsAvgEV AvgTOIxGFxGACFCASOGSOGAGFGA
P1120:410:418:080.130.20882301
P281:151:069:570.400.121424200
P380:590:577:530.230.41734300
Game280:560:5225:580.750.73291310801

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model. On-ice xG counts shots on goal only, where a team's xG and a skater's own ixG also count missed shots.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOI ▾xGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Quinn–Ostlund–Benson111:130.360.1867.2%1113572.2%17.1%22.2%10361
Thompson–Norris–Doan110:190.530.3163.2%0015671.4%16.6%19.1%10574
McLeod–Krebs–Helenius19:570.000.460.0%0031121.4%-40.1%-52.9%1906
Carrick–Malenstyn–Kulich16:000.040.1621.6%023442.9%-15.2%-27.2%3322
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOI ▾xGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Samuelsson–Dahlin113:030.380.4545.4%0113959.1%2.1%-2.7%8945
Crevier–Power110:190.600.1877.1%1112763.2%6.8%35.6%115102
Grzelcyk–Metsa18:120.000.010.0%005455.6%-1.9%-47.7%3201
Dahlin–Power15:220.080.2623.0%004357.1%-0.3%-26.6%3232
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1M. KniesCBJ | LW2G 1A 3P
2Z. WerenskiCBJ | D0G 2A 2P
3C. CoyleCBJ | C0G 3A 3P

Team Stats

BUFCBJ
26Shots on Goal23
10.5%Shooting % (5v5)21.4%
.786Save % (5v5).895
0.891PDO (5v5)1.109
29 (45%)Faceoffs Won36 (55%)
5Power Play Chances3
0%PP%67%
33%PK%100%
0PPG2
11Penalty Minutes15
21Hits25
8Blocked Shots15
15Giveaways13
2Takeaways6

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
07:21GOAL (BUF): Mattias Samuelsson (1), assists: Noah Ostlund, Owen PowerxG 0.05
12:51GOAL (CBJ): Cole Sillinger (1), assists: Charlie Coyle, Denton MateychukxG 0.18
17:58GOAL (CBJ): Matthew Knies (1), assists: Charlie Coyle, Zach Werenski(PP)xG 0.24
18:44GOAL (CBJ): Adam Fantilli (1), assists: Zach Werenski, Matthew KniesxG 0.06
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
01:25GOAL (BUF): Jack Quinn (1), assists: Zach Benson, Noah OstlundxG 0.09
07:45GOAL (CBJ): Matthew Knies (2), assists: Emil Andrae, Kent JohnsonxG 0.10
13:14GOAL (BUF): Konsta Helenius (1), assists: Ryan McLeod, Owen PowerxG 0.08
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
14:21GOAL (CBJ): Sean Monahan (1), assists: Valeri Nichushkin, Dmitri Voronkov(PP)xG 0.24
17:53GOAL (CBJ): Mathieu Olivier (1), assists: Charlie Coyle(EN)xG 0.48
20:00Period end
20:00Game end
vs CHI (Oct 3, 2026) ›