@ VAN (Dec 11, 2025)vs PHI (Dec 18, 2025) ›

December 14, 2025

Climate Pledge Arena | Seattle

BUF 31 SEA

FINAL

Head-to-Head vs SEA all-time
1ST2ND3RDT
BUF1113
SEA0101
Shots on goal BUF 23, SEA 24W A. LyonL J. Daccord
Game Leaders
2 (2A)
POINTS
1.7
GAME SCORE
5
SHOTS
0.93
XG
20:35
TOI (F)
26:30
TOI (D)
.958 (23/24)
SAVE %
Game Control
BUFSEABUF shareSEA share
5-on-5
Expected goals2.092.2348.4%51.6%
Shot attempts425543.3%56.7%
Shot attempts, score-adjusted46.550.348.0%52.0%
High-danger chances5550.0%50.0%
Power play
Goals, of chances0 of 2 (0%)1 of 3 (33%)
Expected goals0.550.5948.3%51.7%
Shot attempts10662.5%37.5%
High-danger chances2166.7%33.3%
Shorthanded expected goals0.020.00100.0%0.0%
All situations
Expected goals3.482.8255.3%44.7%
Shot attempts546246.6%53.4%
High-danger chances8657.1%42.9%
How this is measured

Shot attempts include missed and blocked shots. Expected goals (xG) weigh each unblocked shot by its chance of going in; high-danger is 0.12 xG or more. Power-play goals and chances are the NHL's line, which counts a double minor as two chances and a 5-on-3 from two penalties as two, so the count can run above the number of penalties in the Full Game Log below. Score-adjusted is the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site.

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFSEA

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-SEA.
 1ST2ND3RDTotal
Faceoffs Won9-85-118-622-25
Hits10-92-35-1117-23
Takeaways1-13-21-25-5
Giveaways8-74-37-319-13
PDO (5v5): BUF 1.111SEA 0.889. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

Tied for only 17 minutes, too few for a score-tied view.

P3 20:00
+11+60-6-11shot attemptsBUFSEA

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 47%.

P3 20:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFSEA
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P1 17:09N. Ostlund (4) 47% to 67%+20
  2. P2 10:08T. Thompson (16) 71% to 88%+17
  3. P2 12:24C. Stephenson (6), power play 86% to 72%-14
  4. P2 15:53Hooking on Josh Doan, 2 min 74% to 69%-5

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value comes from both teams' goals for and against to that date, regressed toward the league average early in a season, plus home ice.

Expected Goals

Cumulative xG from the game. What is xG?

BUF 3.48xGSEA 2.82
P3 20:00
01234123

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

xG range
Replay
P3 19:43
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

7 of 8 winning traits showed up tonight. Win rates are over the full 2025–26 regular season (82 games).

Wins (50)Losses (32, 9 in overtime or a shootout)This game
3+ scorersxG share 50%+, allGoalie > xGD combined 3+ ptsScored firstMore HD chances, allShot qualityDepth goal50%100%
Yes
3+ different scorers
Sabres win 82% when yes, 28% when no
Yes
xG share 50%+ (all situations)
Sabres win 77% when yes, 38% when no
Yes
Goalie beat expected
Sabres win 80% when yes, 38% when no
No
Defensemen combined for 3+ points
Sabres win 76% when yes, 45% when no
Yes
Scored first
Sabres win 82% when yes, 37% when no
Yes
More high-danger chances (all situations)
Sabres win 71% when yes, 50% when no
Yes
Better shot quality than opponent
Sabres win 70% when yes, 49% when no
Yes
Depth forward scored
Sabres win 77% when yes, 44% when no

Shift Rhythm

Neither team spent an unusual amount of time on long shifts.

BUFSEATypical game, 2025–26
Time on long shifts (5v5)0:460:370:53
Shot attempts against in that time401

Goals and shift length

How long the scored-on skaters had been on the ice.

PeriodClockScored byPast 1:00Longest
P117:09BUF0 of 5J. Oleksiak 0:28
P210:08BUF0 of 5V. Dunn 0:21
P212:24SEA PP0 of 4A. Tuch 0:06

When Buffalo was on long shifts

PeriodClockPast 1:00Skaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P34:56 to 5:180:2230
P311:40 to 11:480:08
A. Tuch 1:08
10

When Seattle was on long shifts

PeriodClockPast 1:00Skaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P22:29 to 2:450:1600
How this is measured

Long shift. A skater on for 1:00 or more of unbroken play, mostly at even strength. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. A team is on long shifts at 5v5 when 3 or more of its skaters are past that minute, and only the time past the minute counts: the first minute plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the team is defending (in 2025–26, a team on long shifts took 24% of the shot attempts in that time, which was 1.9% of all 5v5 play). Time on long shifts is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Goals. Each goal lists the skaters it was scored on and how long each had been out, with the same unbroken play clock. Power-play goals count too, though a penalty kill unit runs long by design. Empty-net and shootout goals are left out. Stretches under 0:15 with no shot attempt or goal against are not listed, though their time is in the totals.

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2025–26 regular season, counting both teams (164 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. A sentence at the top only appears when time on long shifts is among the highest fifth of those, or when a goal went in with 3 or more of the scored-on team's skaters past the minute.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is on a long shift and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

28 shifts, averaging 0:57. 7 were long shifts.

Replay
Shift 28
Long shiftGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:56P2avg 0:46P3avg 1:000:000:301:001:302:002:30151015202528Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2025–26: 0:45, 0:50 (the long change), 0:47.

Mattias Samuelsson by period

On ice, all situations. xG counts shots on goal. EV Avg counts shifts that started at even strength.

PeriodShiftsAvgEV AvgTOIxGFxGACFCASOGSOGAGFGA
P190:560:568:270.160.02684100
P2100:550:469:070.210.616141611
P391:001:008:560.990.211095310
Game280:570:5526:301.350.842231101021

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIxGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Thompson–Krebs–Doan113:090.030.0265.2%00131252.0%10.2%21.5%10621
McLeod–Quinn–Benson110:300.110.5218.0%0051327.8%-17.0%-30.6%31227
Tuch–Norris–Ostlund110:010.270.2651.2%10101147.6%5.0%8.4%8965
Greenway–Malenstyn–Kozak16:360.000.0112.5%002820.0%-24.4%-31.5%2611
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIxGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Samuelsson–Dahlin116:260.300.2356.7%00181948.6%6.8%14.6%141174
Timmins–Byram111:410.010.351.7%0031615.8%-30.4%-46.2%21418
Bryson–Power18:410.180.2938.4%008850.0%7.5%-6.2%6642
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1T. ThompsonBUF | C1G 0A 1P
2A. TuchBUF | RW0G 2A 2P
3C. StephensonSEA | C1G 0A 1P

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
SOG
ixG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGS
#89 A. Tuch (RW)
0
2
2
+2
0
3
0.36
-0.4
14:0254.5%+18.1%43.8%+0.7%42.3%100.0%1.222
1.41.4
17:07
#6 Z. Benson (LW)
1
0
1
+1
0
2
0.93
+0.1
13:3732.2%-25.8%37.0%-8.7%30.4%1.000
0.40.5
18:03
#9 J. Norris (C)
0
1
1
+1
0
1
0.19
-0.2
12:3757.0%+16.0%52.0%+11.7%52.4%100.0%1.125
1.01.0
15:46
#19 P. Krebs (C)
0
1
1
+1
0
1
0.32
-0.3
15:4887.9%+48.9%54.8%+17.0%63.2%100.0%1.250
1.41.2
15:48
#22 J. Quinn (RW)
0
1
1
+1
0
2
0.20
-0.2
13:0629.2%-25.0%33.3%-12.7%29.4%1.000
0.60.5
14:31
#71 R. McLeod (C)
0
1
1
+1
0
0
12:2229.4%-26.7%28.0%-20.6%25.0%1.000
-0.10.0
16:00
#72 T. Thompson (C)
1
0
1
+1
0
4
0.40
+0.6
17:2472.2%+37.1%61.8%+28.4%68.2%100.0%1.167
1.11.7
20:35
#86 N. Ostlund (C)
1
0
1
+1
0
1
0.17
+0.8
12:0452.9%+9.8%52.2%+11.6%52.6%100.0%1.143
0.31.0
12:04
#12 J. Greenway (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.03
0.0
8:3712.5%-33.4%16.7%-30.4%22.2%1.000
-0.3-0.3
9:47
#29 B. Malenstyn (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
0
8:1338.9%-6.9%28.6%-17.2%30.0%1.000
-0.3-0.3
9:34
#48 T. Kozak (C)
0
0
0
0
0
0
9:150.7%-52.2%13.3%-35.4%15.4%1.000
-0.6-0.5
10:23
#91 J. Doan (RW)
0
0
0
0
2
1
0.50
-0.5
15:4568.0%+27.0%56.3%+19.3%66.7%1.000
0.50.1
19:04
#4 B. Byram (D)
0
0
0
+2
0
0
17:3850.5%+7.5%33.3%-14.4%32.0%100.0%1.500
-0.5-0.2
20:33
#21 C. Timmins (D)
0
0
0
0
2
0
15:233.9%-59.3%22.2%-29.2%18.2%1.000
-0.9-0.8
17:10
#23 M. Samuelsson (D)
0
0
0
+2
0
0
0.00
0.0
22:1660.8%+25.9%45.7%+4.5%51.6%100.0%1.111
0.20.4
26:30
#25 O. Power (D)
0
0
0
+1
0
2
0.25
-0.2
17:0456.8%+16.8%58.6%+21.9%56.5%100.0%1.125
0.60.6
19:19
#26 R. Dahlin (D)
0
0
0
+1
2
5
0.12
-0.1
19:4159.8%+19.8%47.6%+7.6%51.7%1.000
0.30.2
23:32
#78 J. Bryson (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.01
0.0
10:0828.7%-23.9%45.0%+2.1%46.7%1.000
-0.10.0
10:08
Total
3
6
9
6
23
3.48
6.5

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOIDec
#34 A. Lyon2412.8.958+1.81.660:00W

Team Stats

BUFSEA
23Shots on Goal24
11.1%Shooting % (5v5)0.0%
1.000Save % (5v5).889
1.111PDO (5v5)0.889
22 (47%)Faceoffs Won25 (53%)
2Power Play Chances3
0%PP%33%
67%PK%100%
0PPG1
6Penalty Minutes4
17Hits23
13Blocked Shots11
19Giveaways13
5Takeaways5

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
17:09GOAL (BUF): Noah Ostlund (4), assists: Josh Norris, Alex TuchxG 0.07
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
10:08GOAL (BUF): Tage Thompson (16), assists: Peyton Krebs, Alex TuchxG 0.21
12:24GOAL (SEA): Chandler Stephenson (6), assists: Vince Dunn, Jordan Eberle(PP)xG 0.04
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
19:14GOAL (BUF): Zach Benson (2), assists: Jack Quinn, Ryan McLeod(EN)xG 0.81
20:00Period end
20:00Game end
@ VAN (Dec 11, 2025)vs PHI (Dec 18, 2025) ›