2025–26 Round 1

Buffalo Sabres vs Boston Bruins

The Sabres defeated the Bruins 4-2.

View 2025–26 team statsView 2025–26 standingsRound 2 vs MTL breakdown
Series Summary

Buffalo had the better expected goals in all situations and won the series 4-2.

4-2
RECORD
20
GF
12
GA
+8
DIFF
53.4%
xGF% 5v5
53.3%
CF% 5v5
4.2%
PP%
87.5%
PK%
FINISHING
Buffalo 20 goals on 22.23 xG
BOS 12 goals on 15.64 xG
IN NET
Buffalo Luukkonen .825 (-2.3 GSAx)
Buffalo Lyon .955 (+5.4 GSAx)
TOP SKATER
Tuch, 8.0 series Game Score (4G, 3A)
BEST LINE
Doan–Ostlund–Benson, 82.3% of 5v5 xG and 2-0 on goals
BEST PAIR
Dahlin–Byram, 78.5% of 5v5 xG and 1-0 on goals
Game Control
BUFBOSBUF shareBOS share
5-on-5
Expected goals11.5910.1153.4%46.6%
Shot attempts28424953.3%46.7%
High-danger chances272650.9%49.1%
Power play
Goals, of chances1 of 24 (4%)2 of 16 (13%)
Expected goals5.123.2960.9%39.1%
Shot attempts814862.8%37.2%
High-danger chances141450.0%50.0%
Shorthanded expected goals0.270.8025.3%74.7%
All situations
Expected goals22.2315.6458.7%41.3%
Shot attempts40833455.0%45.0%
High-danger chances524852.0%48.0%

Shot attempts include missed and blocked shots. Expected goals (xG) weigh each unblocked shot by its chance of going in; high-danger is 0.12 xG or more. Power-play goals and chances are the NHL's line, which counts a double minor as two chances and a 5-on-3 from two penalties as two. Best line and pair: among units with a winning 5-on-5 xG share, at least 10:00 together and 0.25 xG in those minutes (half that where a goal was scored in them), one that came out ahead on the goals scored and allowed with it out ranks first; the rest is the best mix of that share and those goals, weighted two to one.

Doan–Ostlund–BensonBEST LINE

82.3% of xG (0.87 to 0.19), 2-0 on goals and 20-7 on attempts in 18:13 together. Benson scored with the line out. Small sample.

Dahlin–ByramBEST D PAIR

78.5% of xG (0.93 to 0.25), 1-0 on goals and 35-9 on attempts in 13:52 together. Small sample.

Series xG

Cumulative xG across all 6 games, all situations. What is xG?

BUF 22.23xGBOS 15.64
G6 OT 20:00
0102030Game 1Game 2Game 3Game 4Game 5Game 6

By Game

All situations, by game.

BUFBOS

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line on the game page.

Win Probability by Game

Buffalo's chance of winning, one game at a time.

Game 1, Apr 19, 2026: BOS 3 at BUF 4. Game page

WIN PROBABILITY

Opened at 56%.

P3 20:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFBOS
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P3 15:44T. Thompson (2) 9% to 53%+44
  2. P3 16:36M. Samuelsson (1) 53% to 94%+41
  3. P1 10:52M. Geekie (1) 56% to 37%-19
  4. P3 01:08E. Lindholm (1) 25% to 8%-17

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

xG range
Replay
Game 6
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

Winning traits, game by game. Definitions and season win rates are on Team Stats.

Wins (4)Losses (2, 1 in overtime)
3+ scorersxG share 50%+, allGoalie > xGD combined 3+ ptsScored firstMore HD chances, allShot qualityDepth goal50%100%

6 games: a small sample.

Goal Differential Breakdown

Buffalo finished +8 over 6 games. Biggest pieces: goaltending +3.5, goalie pulled +3.0.

Added goalsCost goalsGoal differentialWhisker: one standard deviation of shot-outcome noise.
0+5Goals0Start+2.3Even-strengthshot volume-0.5Even-strengthshot quality+2.0Penaltydifferential-0.9Power playefficiency-0.1Penalty killefficiency-1.4Finishing+3.5Goaltending+3.0Goaliepulled+0.1Unmodeled+8Goaldifferential
ROUND 1 VS BOS, GOALS
COMPONENTGOALSNOISE (ONE SD)REPEATS
Even-strength shot volume+2.3±1.2Usually
Even-strength shot quality-0.5n/aUsually
Penalty differential+2.0n/aSometimes
Power play efficiency-0.9n/aUsually
Penalty kill efficiency-0.1n/aUsually
Finishing-1.4±3.9Sometimes
Goaltending+3.5±3.5Sometimes
Goalie pulled+3.0n/aNot a skill
Unmodeled+0.1n/an/a
Goal differential+8n/an/a

Repeats asks whether a team doing this in one half of a season keeps doing it in the other, league-wide.

How this is measured
Even-strength shot volume
Out-attempting opponents at even strength, with every unblocked attempt priced at the league's average even-strength shot for the season.
Even-strength shot quality
Getting better chances than opponents at even strength, beyond the attempt count.
Penalty differential
Discipline plus drawing: minutes up a skater minus minutes down, priced at the league's net xG per power-play minute.
Power play efficiency
Net xG on the power play above or below league-rate conversion of Buffalo's own power-play minutes, shorthanded chances conceded included.
Penalty kill efficiency
Net xG on the penalty kill above or below league-rate cost of Buffalo's own shorthanded minutes, shorthanded chances created included. Positive means fewer net chances conceded than the league would have.
Finishing
Goals scored above or below what Buffalo's chances were worth, goalie in the net.
Goaltending
Goals allowed below or above what opponents' chances were worth, goalie in the net.
Goalie pulled
Net goals with a goalie pulled: into an empty net, or by the extra attacker. Follows who was trailing late, not a skill of its own.
Unmodeled
Goals on shots the model could not score, plus any goal the shot list is missing.
  • 20 for, 12 against, regulation and overtime; the rows sum to the goal differential before rounding.
  • Built from 6 of 6 games with xG data.
  • Even-strength volume is priced at the league's average even-strength attempt for the season (0.0623 xG in 2025-26), and penalty differential at the league's net xG per power-play minute (0.104), both measured over every game in the league with the same model. Over the games covered, Buffalo's own games averaged 0.0572 xG per even-strength attempt; quality is what remains of the even-strength xG gap after volume.
  • Power-play and shorthanded minutes are read from the situation code on each play, both goalies in, which runs slightly above the official power-play figure because a penalty that expires between two plays is credited to the earlier state. The league rate per minute is priced on the same clock, so the two cancel.
  • Regulation and overtime goals only. A shootout's deciding goal is not a shot the model sees and is left out.
  • Shots at an empty net, and shots by a team with its own goalie pulled, count only as actual goals in the goalie-pulled bar. Both depend on who was trailing late, so they stay out of finishing, goaltending, special teams and even strength.
  • Goaltending leaves out shots taken while the opponent's goalie was pulled; those count only under Goalie pulled. The Goalies table's GSAx counts every shot faced, so it reads +3.1 against +3.5 here.
  • Whiskers on finishing and goaltending are one standard deviation of shot-outcome noise, each shot a coin flip weighted at its xG. The volume whisker is a Poisson approximation from the attempt counts. Quality, the three special-teams bars, goalie pulled and unmodeled carry no whisker.
  • Repeats asks how much of a component carries from one half of a team's season to the other, measured league-wide over 2016-17 to 2025-26 (314 team-seasons) with the same model: a split-half correlation, corrected to full-season length. Usually is 0.6 and above, sometimes 0.3 to 0.6, rarely below 0.3. Even a full season of finishing is about one third signal and two thirds shot-outcome luck.

Actual vs Expected

Summed across the series. Green beat expected, red fell short. What is xG?

Skaters: Goals vs xG

xGGoals
01345Bowen ByramBowen Byram: 1.0 xGBowen Byram: 3 Goals (+2.0 vs expected)3 / 1.0Mattias SamuelssonMattias Samuelsson: 0.2 xGMattias Samuelsson: 2 Goals (+1.8 vs expected)2 / 0.2Beck MalenstynBeck Malenstyn: 0.1 xGBeck Malenstyn: 1 Goals (+0.9 vs expected)1 / 0.1Zach BensonZach Benson: 1.2 xGZach Benson: 2 Goals (+0.8 vs expected)2 / 1.2Peyton KrebsPeyton Krebs: 1.2 xGPeyton Krebs: 2 Goals (+0.8 vs expected)2 / 1.2Alex TuchAlex Tuch: 3.3 xGAlex Tuch: 4 Goals (+0.7 vs expected)4 / 3.3Josh DunneJosh Dunne: 0.1 xGJosh Dunne: 0 Goals (-0.1 vs expected)0 / 0.1Noah OstlundNoah Ostlund: 1.1 xGNoah Ostlund: 1 Goals (-0.1 vs expected)1 / 1.1Jordan GreenwayJordan Greenway: 0.1 xGJordan Greenway: 0 Goals (-0.1 vs expected)0 / 0.1Conor TimminsConor Timmins: 0.3 xGConor Timmins: 0 Goals (-0.3 vs expected)0 / 0.3Logan StanleyLogan Stanley: 0.3 xGLogan Stanley: 0 Goals (-0.3 vs expected)0 / 0.3Rasmus DahlinRasmus Dahlin: 1.3 xGRasmus Dahlin: 1 Goals (-0.3 vs expected)1 / 1.3Josh NorrisJosh Norris: 1.4 xGJosh Norris: 1 Goals (-0.4 vs expected)1 / 1.4Ryan McLeodRyan McLeod: 0.5 xGRyan McLeod: 0 Goals (-0.5 vs expected)0 / 0.5Owen PowerOwen Power: 0.6 xGOwen Power: 0 Goals (-0.5 vs expected)0 / 0.6Tyson KozakTyson Kozak: 1.0 xGTyson Kozak: 0 Goals (-1.0 vs expected)0 / 1.0Tage ThompsonTage Thompson: 3.1 xGTage Thompson: 2 Goals (-1.1 vs expected)2 / 3.1Josh DoanJosh Doan: 2.3 xGJosh Doan: 1 Goals (-1.3 vs expected)1 / 2.3Jack QuinnJack Quinn: 1.6 xGJack Quinn: 0 Goals (-1.5 vs expected)0 / 1.6Jason ZuckerJason Zucker: 1.6 xGJason Zucker: 0 Goals (-1.6 vs expected)0 / 1.6

Goalies: Goals Against vs xGA

xGAGoals Against
036912Alex LyonAlex Lyon: 10.4 xGAAlex Lyon: 5 Goals Against (+5.4 vs expected)5 / 10.4Ukko-Pekka LuukkonenUkko-Pekka Luukkonen: 4.7 xGAUkko-Pekka Luukkonen: 7 Goals Against (-2.3 vs expected)7 / 4.7

Skaters

Player
GP
Scoring
PP
TOI/G
Hits
Blocks
GV
TK
Expected
On-Ice
Game Score
GAP ▾+/-PIMSOGixGGAxOn-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOGSxGS
Tage Thompson
6
257+71826
0
20:19
10
6
8
0
3.1-1.1
83:2761.7%+11.9%53.3%0.0%56.1%87.5%1.124
7.98.0
Alex Tuch
6
437+8420
0
21:19
21
9
5
4
3.3+0.7
78:5863.6%+14.5%51.7%-2.3%55.8%100.0%1.140
8.06.7
Peyton Krebs
6
246+886
0
16:21
13
5
6
2
1.2+0.8
87:1163.1%+14.3%52.2%-1.7%54.4%87.5%1.126
6.24.9
Bowen Byram
6
325+6215
0
22:52
4
6
8
0
1.0+2.0
104:4153.7%-1.0%53.5%+0.4%52.1%69.2%1.086
6.34.2
Owen Power
6
044+507
0
20:37
3
4
5
0
0.6-0.5
101:3853.5%-1.4%51.6%-2.6%51.4%70.0%1.076
4.03.9
Rasmus Dahlin
6
134+3621
1
24:11
10
6
12
1
1.3-0.3
101:0068.8%+23.4%64.2%+17.0%65.2%55.6%0.947
7.47.8
Zach Benson
6
213+32811
0
14:43
7
1
1
2
1.2+0.8
70:5060.6%+8.5%63.3%+13.2%62.1%66.7%1.005
5.24.5
Jack Quinn
6
033-1012
0
16:46
11
0
5
0
1.6-1.5
72:5538.1%-22.7%52.0%-1.7%50.5%44.4%0.998
3.04.2
Josh Doan
6
123+3213
0
15:05
14
0
2
5
2.3-1.3
71:0763.0%+11.5%67.8%+18.6%64.0%66.7%1.014
5.56.3
Beck Malenstyn
6
112044
0
11:12
22
6
2
1
0.1+0.9
51:4352.0%-2.5%41.3%-14.5%45.3%50.0%1.038
1.40.7
Mattias Samuelsson
6
202+108
0
20:56
19
8
5
1
0.2+1.8
105:1849.7%-6.4%50.8%-3.8%53.6%50.0%0.986
2.81.5
Noah Ostlund
3
112+324
0
11:31
0
1
2
0
1.1-0.1
24:3171.6%+19.2%62.2%+9.5%69.0%100.0%1.133
2.42.2
Josh Norris
3
101+104
0
16:39
11
1
3
0
1.4-0.4
35:0047.0%-8.4%54.7%+1.6%52.0%33.3%0.933
1.41.8
Jordan Greenway
6
011042
0
11:09
15
1
2
2
0.2-0.1
50:0852.6%-1.8%40.2%-15.6%44.4%50.0%1.052
0.20.3
Jason Zucker
6
011-1211
0
16:50
13
2
9
1
1.6-1.6
67:1237.5%-22.4%54.3%+1.4%53.5%33.3%0.940
1.83.2
Ryan McLeod
6
011-427
0
18:18
0
2
11
1
0.5-0.5
70:3936.0%-25.2%54.4%+1.5%51.8%33.3%0.914
1.42.1
Tyson Kozak
4
011+104
0
11:53
12
4
1
0
1.0-1.0
45:0153.1%-1.3%44.2%-10.7%46.2%100.0%1.091
0.91.5
Josh Dunne
2
000+101
0
7:55
2
2
1
0
0.1-0.1
15:1987.3%+34.4%54.2%+0.9%61.1%100.0%1.143
0.70.7
Conor Timmins
6
000+269
0
15:46
5
12
2
1
0.3-0.3
76:3245.2%-11.6%46.5%-9.6%50.5%60.0%1.056
0.70.7
Logan Stanley
5
000055
0
13:52
6
6
1
1
0.3-0.3
56:2042.9%-13.2%51.3%-2.5%54.4%50.0%1.008
1.01.2
Michael Kesselring
1
000000
0
4:25
0
0
0
0
––
4:250.8%-54.0%16.7%-37.0%25.0%–1.000
-0.2-0.2

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. "Rel" is measured against the team's series-wide 5-on-5 line with that skater off the ice.

Goalies

GoalieGP ▾W-LGAGAASV%SOTOI/GxGAGSAxGS
Alex Lyon53-151.14.955152:3610.4+5.46.9
Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen21-174.19.825050:054.7-2.3-1.9

A goalie is credited a game played for any appearance, relief included, so GP sums above the team's own games played by the number of relief outings.

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5 in the series, summed over all 6 games.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
Best at 5v5: Doan–Ostlund–Benson, 82.3% of xG and 2-0 on goals (min 10:00 together and 0.25 xG, half that with a goal; units ahead on goals rank first, then the best mix of xG share and on-ice goals, weighted two to one).
LineGPTOI ▾xGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Tuch–Thompson–Krebs665:522.781.5464.4%60767251.4%-2.3%15.5%55443628
Zucker–McLeod–Quinn655:451.041.9335.1%24685654.8%2.3%-23.6%48432628
Greenway–Malenstyn–Kozak427:390.380.6338.0%10203735.1%-20.1%-16.9%1523714
Norris–Doan–Benson327:070.360.9228.1%12282354.9%2.1%-28.2%1920912
Doan–Ostlund–Benson318:130.870.1982.3%2020774.1%22.2%31.0%175134
Greenway–Malenstyn–Dunne212:080.260.0291.7%1011761.1%8.4%38.8%9554
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
Best at 5v5: Dahlin–Byram, 78.5% of xG and 1-0 on goals (min 10:00 together and 0.25 xG, half that with a goal; units ahead on goals rank first, then the best mix of xG share and on-ice goals, weighted two to one).
LineGPTOI ▾xGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Samuelsson–Dahlin673:181.601.2556.0%33685356.2%4.1%2.9%48353124
Byram–Power668:572.562.3352.3%63726851.4%-2.2%-2.1%55543334
Stanley–Timmins545:110.480.9733.2%11494651.6%-1.7%-22.9%35291422
Samuelsson–Power614:200.300.4043.3%10111052.4%-0.7%-10.9%8955
Dahlin–Byram613:520.930.2578.5%1035979.5%28.9%27.1%238143
Timmins–Byram410:030.100.3820.0%1041323.5%-30.5%-34.9%3927
Pageof 1

With or Without You

Buffalo's 5v5 CF% and xGF% with Samuelsson on the ice, with and without each teammate. Δ is together minus apart. That gap is always measured from the named player's side, so the same pair can read positive on one player's table and negative on the other's. Round 1 vs BOS, minimum 20:00 together. Together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice, so a pair's time and xGF% here differ slightly from the Line Combinations table, which counts only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit.

Teammate
TOGETHER
SAMUELSSON APART
IMPACT
TOI Together ▾CF%xGF%CF%xGF%Δ CF%Δ xGF%
Dahlin
73:4356.2%56.0%
40.3%34.8%
+15.9+21.2
McLeod
32:3252.5%44.8%
50.0%51.9%
+2.5-7.1
Krebs
31:4760.3%63.5%
45.8%42.3%
+14.5+21.2
Quinn
31:4247.3%36.8%
52.3%55.0%
-5.0-18.2
Zucker
30:3850.0%48.0%
51.2%50.3%
-1.2-2.3
Thompson
29:1965.0%70.3%
43.9%40.5%
+21.1+29.8
Tuch
28:4959.3%77.6%
46.8%37.4%
+12.5+40.2
Doan
22:2259.4%31.9%
49.0%54.5%
+10.4-22.6
Malenstyn
22:1138.2%50.4%
53.7%49.6%
-15.5+0.8
Benson
21:4752.9%38.3%
50.3%52.4%
+2.6-14.1
Greenway
21:4433.3%44.3%
54.7%50.8%
-21.4-6.5

Shift Profile

Shift length and on-ice results, the Round 1 series vs BOS. Empty-net goals against are left out.

What do Short %, Hemmed-In Shifts, Long-Change Gap etc. mean?
GP (shifts)
Games in which the NHL shift chart has rows for this skater. It can read lower than the games played in the Skaters table, because a game with no usable shift chart is left out of every column here.
Short / Long
"Short" is a skater's shifts under 0:45; "Long" is their shifts of 1:00 or more. Short % / Long % is the share of all their shifts that fall in that range.
CF% (short) / CF% (long)
Shot-attempt share (Corsi) specifically during a skater's own short shifts versus their own long shifts. Compares whether they generate or allow more when the shift is quick versus when it drags on.
GF-GA (long)
Goals for minus goals against specifically during a skater's shifts of 1:00 or more. A single-game or short-series number here is a very small sample; look for it to hold up across a season.
PP Shifts / PK Shifts
Number of shifts a skater started while their team had a power play or was shorthanded, tagged by the strength in effect at the moment they stepped on the ice.
Long-Change Gap
This skater's average 2nd-period shift length minus the average of their 1st and 3rd. Positive means their shifts really do run longer in the 2nd, but that period is the "long change" (the bench sits at center ice, so whichever team is defending the far end can't change on the fly as easily), so a positive gap isn't automatically fatigue.
Hemmed-In Shifts
Even-strength shifts in which the unit was on for more than 60 seconds of unbroken play: no whistle came, so they could not change. The number in parentheses is how many of those only ended at a whistle. Most of such a shift is ordinary play: the first minute looks like any other stretch of the game, and only the time past it tilts hard toward the defending end (the game page counts that as pinned time). Shift length is an outcome here, not a cause, so this column says nothing about why a goal went in.
Short-Rest Shifts
Even-strength shifts a skater started after less than 45 seconds on the bench, same period only (an intermission is a full rest). Power-play and penalty-kill units legitimately take long shifts and short rests, so both of these columns leave them out.
PlayerGP (shifts)Shifts ▾Avg ShiftShort %Long %CF% (short)CF% (long)GF-GA (long)PP ShiftsPK ShiftsLong-Change GapHemmed-In ShiftsShort-Rest Shifts
A. Tuch61630:4750.9%23.3%47.1%68.8%+22424+7s1210
R. McLeod61630:4062.0%12.3%49.5%68.6%-124270s410
R. Dahlin61630:5346.0%30.7%55.4%78.1%+12210+9s13 (5 to whistle)17
M. Samuelsson61590:4746.5%20.1%47.3%36.4%-1519+6s20 (7 to whistle)23
B. Byram61580:5244.3%36.7%46.9%59.0%022100s26 (6 to whistle)19
O. Power61520:4945.4%28.3%51.1%53.8%+31317+4s24 (4 to whistle)11
T. Thompson61500:4945.3%26.0%54.8%73.1%+22110+7s16 (2 to whistle)7
P. Krebs61360:4355.9%21.3%47.5%57.3%+189+1s19 (6 to whistle)8
J. Doan61320:4157.6%15.2%66.7%74.4%-1185+3s9 (5 to whistle)1
C. Timmins61310:4355.7%16.8%43.5%21.7%-1324+2s12 (3 to whistle)13
J. Quinn61280:4751.6%24.2%51.4%71.9%0181+4s13 (2 to whistle)7
Z. Benson61270:4252.8%15.0%63.0%68.6%0175+6s9 (2 to whistle)2
J. Zucker61230:4948.8%27.6%47.6%85.7%+1200+2s11 (1 to whistle)4
B. Malenstyn61080:3772.2%11.1%41.3%13.2%-1716+4s5 (2 to whistle)1
J. Greenway61040:3973.1%13.5%39.7%22.2%-19140s6 (2 to whistle)1
L. Stanley5890:4740.4%16.9%47.5%31.1%0313+8s9 (1 to whistle)7
T. Kozak4780:3773.1%7.7%53.2%13.3%033+10s4 (1 to whistle)2
J. Norris3690:4356.5%17.4%67.3%63.6%0121+5s5 (2 to whistle)0
N. Ostlund3470:4453.2%19.1%55.6%100.0%063+10s3 (1 to whistle)0
J. Dunne2260:3769.2%11.5%47.1%66.7%020+3s3 (1 to whistle)1
M. Kesselring150:5360.0%40.0%0.0%25.0%000+50s20