@ CHI (Jan 8, 2016)@ MIN (Jan 12, 2016) ›

January 10, 2016

MTS Centre | Winnipeg

BUF 42 WPG

FINAL

Head-to-Head vs WPG all-time
1ST2ND3RDT
BUF2024
WPG1102
Shots on goal BUF 29, WPG 44W L. UllmarkL C. Hellebuyck
Summary

WPG had more shot attempts in all situations, but Buffalo won 4-2.

IN NET
Buffalo L. Ullmark .955
WPG C. Hellebuyck .893
POWER PLAY
Buffalo 1 of 3
WPG 1 of 2
TURNING POINT
M. Foligno goal (P3 4:12), Sabres win chance rises from 46% to 79%
WIN DNA
3 of 4 winning traits
SHIFTS
Winnipeg pinned 1:40 at 5v5 (typical 0:53)
Game Leaders
S. Reinhart
3 (3G)
POINTS
S. Reinhart
2.6
GAME SCORE
R. O'Reilly
22:06
TOI (F)
R. Ristolainen
26:30
TOI (D)
L. Ullmark
.955 (42/44)
SAVE %

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFWPG

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-WPG.
 1ST2ND3RDTotal
Faceoffs Won10-1514-915-939-33
Hits9-147-97-1223-35
Takeaways2-32-43-37-10
Giveaways2-55-10-27-8
PDO (5v5): BUF 1.060WPG 0.940. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

P3 20:00
+25+130-13-25shot attemptsBUFWPG

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 44%.

P3 20:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFWPG
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P3 04:12M. Foligno (3) 46% to 79%+33
  2. P2 00:55M. Perreault (7), power play 66% to 45%-21
  3. P1 14:29S. Reinhart (11), power play 46% to 66%+20
  4. P1 05:21B. Wheeler (11) 63% to 44%-19

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value comes from both teams' goals for and against to that date, regressed toward the league average early in a season, plus home ice.

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

Replay
P3 19:59
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

3 of 4 winning traits showed up tonight. Win rates are over the full 2015–16 regular season (82 games).

Wins (35)Losses (47, 11 in overtime or a shootout)This game
3+ scorersD combined 3+ ptsScored firstDepth goal50%100%
No
3+ different scorers
Sabres win 83% when yes, 19% when no
Yes
Defensemen combined for 3+ points
Sabres win 63% when yes, 37% when no
Yes
Scored first
Sabres win 60% when yes, 30% when no
Yes
Depth forward scored
Sabres win 62% when yes, 27% when no

Shift Rhythm

Winnipeg was pinned for 1:40 at 5v5, well above the typical 0:53 a game, and gave up 2 shot attempts in that time.

Buffalo sent skaters back out on short rest 38 times, well above the typical 22 a game.

Winnipeg sent skaters back out on short rest 47 times, well above the typical 22 a game.

R. Ristolainen went back out on short rest 11 times, once after only 3 seconds on the bench. In a typical game, the busiest skater does it about 4 times.

BUFWPGTypical game, 2025–26
Pinned time (5v5)0:511:400:53
Shot attempts against while pinned121
Short-rest shifts384722

When Winnipeg was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P111:00 to 11:170:17
A. Copp 1:17
00
P118:51 to 18:540:0300
P28:04 to 8:260:2220
P214:50 to 15:150:2500
P36:31 to 6:340:0300

When Buffalo was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P111:01 to 11:170:1600
P112:56 to 13:100:1410
P32:19 to 2:220:0300
P311:30 to 11:420:1200
P313:07 to 13:130:0600
How this is measured

Pinned. A team is pinned when 3 or more of its skaters on the ice are past a minute of unbroken play, at 5v5. A hemmed-in shift is an even-strength shift in which the unit was on for more than 1:00 without a whistle to change on, and stayed at even strength for most of it. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. Only the time past the minute counts: the first minute of those shifts plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the pinned team is defending (in 2025–26, a pinned team took 24% of the shot attempts; pinned time was 1.9% of all 5v5 play). Pinned time is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Short rest. An even-strength shift a skater started after less than 45 seconds on the bench, same period only (an intermission is a full rest).

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2025–26 regular season, counting both teams (164 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. This season has no measured row yet, so 2025–26 stands in. A sentence at the top only appears when a number is among the highest fifth of those, or when a goal went in while a team was pinned.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is pinned and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

33 shifts, averaging 0:43. 4 hemmed-in, 8 after a short rest, 0:35 pinned.

Replay
Shift 33
Hemmed-in shiftShort rest before itGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:44P2avg 0:35P3avg 0:480:000:301:001:302:0015101520253033Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2025–26: 0:45, 0:50 (the long change), 0:47.

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
McGinn–O'Reilly–Kane113:1600111150.0%15.2%7745
Gionta–Foligno–Larsson110:481171828.0%-10.1%614613
Girgensons–Reinhart–Eichel110:220071433.3%-3.8%712610
Legwand–Moulson–Schaller15:27002433.3%-3.5%2221
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
Bogosian–McCabe116:511181732.0%-5.4%713610
Gorges–Ristolainen115:1710112134.4%-2.8%916613
Franson–Weber18:33006940.0%3.6%5858
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1S. ReinhartBUF | C3G 0A 3P
2D. StaffordWPG | RW0G 1A 1P
3L. UllmarkBUF | G2.00 GAA, .955 SV%

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
SOG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGS
#23 S. Reinhart (C)
3
0
3
+2
0
5
13:1139.3%+3.8%42.3%100.0%1.111
2.6
18:40
#9 E. Kane (LW)
0
1
1
+1
0
3
17:3645.2%+13.0%45.5%1.000
1.0
21:32
#12 B. Gionta (RW)
0
1
1
0
0
1
13:5626.7%-15.0%28.0%50.0%1.080
0.1
15:36
#15 J. Eichel (C)
0
1
1
0
0
2
12:4636.4%-0.4%40.0%1.000
0.4
17:13
#22 J. Larsson (LW)
0
1
1
+1
0
2
14:4625.0%-18.1%26.9%66.7%1.230
0.2
16:23
#82 M. Foligno (LW)
1
0
1
+1
0
2
13:2332.1%-6.6%34.8%66.7%1.179
0.6
13:23
#90 R. O'Reilly (C)
0
1
1
+1
0
2
14:5142.3%+7.9%38.9%1.000
0.6
22:06
#6 M. Weber (D)
0
1
1
0
9
1
10:3544.4%+9.7%40.0%1.000
0.2
10:35
#29 J. McCabe (D)
0
1
1
0
0
0
18:0132.0%-6.5%35.0%50.0%1.067
0.2
18:41
#55 R. Ristolainen (D)
0
1
1
+2
0
1
18:0738.2%+2.5%40.7%100.0%1.125
0.7
26:30
#17 D. Legwand (C)
0
0
0
0
0
1
6:4742.9%+6.7%60.0%1.000
0.0
8:55
#26 M. Moulson (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7:3633.3%-3.7%42.9%1.000
-0.2
9:04
#28 Z. Girgensons (C)
0
0
0
0
0
3
13:0242.3%+7.9%45.8%1.000
0.0
13:29
#59 T. Schaller (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
1
6:5833.3%-3.6%50.0%1.000
0.0
7:38
#88 J. McGinn (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
2
14:0544.0%+10.2%43.8%1.000
0.0
17:49
#4 J. Gorges (D)
0
0
0
+2
0
0
17:0736.4%-0.5%38.5%100.0%1.143
-0.2
20:50
#46 C. Franson (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
13:4037.9%+1.9%41.7%1.000
-0.2
14:58
#47 Z. Bogosian (D)
0
0
0
0
0
2
21:4834.1%-4.6%37.5%50.0%1.038
-0.4
23:23
Total
4
8
12
9
29
5.7

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOIDec
#35 L. Ullmark442.9552.760:00W

Team Stats

BUFWPG
29Shots on Goal44
8.7%Shooting % (5v5)2.7%
.973Save % (5v5).913
1.060PDO (5v5)0.940
39 (54%)Faceoffs Won33 (46%)
3Power Play Chances2
33%PP%50%
50%PK%67%
1PPG1
9Penalty Minutes11
23Hits35
13Blocked Shots8
7Giveaways8
7Takeaways10

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
01:37GOAL (BUF): Sam Reinhart (10), assists: Johan Larsson, Mike Weber
05:21GOAL (WPG): Blake Wheeler (11), assists: Bryan Little, Drew Stafford
14:29GOAL (BUF): Sam Reinhart (11), assists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jack Eichel(PP)
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
00:55GOAL (WPG): Mathieu Perreault (7), assists: Andrew Ladd, Bryan Little(PP)
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
04:12GOAL (BUF): Marcus Foligno (3), assists: Brian Gionta, Jake McCabe
19:34GOAL (BUF): Sam Reinhart (12), assists: Evander Kane, Ryan O'Reilly(EN)
20:00Period end
20:00Game end
@ CHI (Jan 8, 2016)@ MIN (Jan 12, 2016) ›