@ OTT (Feb 5, 2013)@ NYI (Feb 9, 2013) ›

February 7, 2013

First Niagara Center | Buffalo

MTL 45 BUF

FINAL / SO

Head-to-Head vs MTL all-time
1ST2ND3RDOTSOT
MTL121004
BUF112015
Shots on goal MTL 32, BUF 40W R. MillerL P. Budaj
Summary

Buffalo had more shot attempts in all situations and won 5-4 in a shootout.

IN NET
Buffalo R. Miller .875
MTL P. Budaj .900
POWER PLAY
Buffalo 1 of 7
MTL 1 of 4
TURNING POINT
P. Subban, power play goal (P2 18:32), Sabres win chance drops from 45% to 19%
WIN DNA
2 of 4 winning traits
Game Leaders
T. Ennis
3 (1G-2A)
POINTS
T. Ennis
2.5
GAME SCORE
T. Vanek
8
SHOTS
T. Vanek
23:56
TOI (F)
C. Ehrhoff
27:40
TOI (D)
R. Miller
.875 (28/32)
SAVE %

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFMTL

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-MTL.
 1ST2ND3RDOTTotal
Faceoffs Won11-911-1011-71-334-29
Hits7-93-43-62-115-20
Takeaways1-12-10-10-23-5
Giveaways6-51-11-00-08-6
PDO (5v5): BUF 0.975MTL 1.025. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

OT 4:55
+17+90-9-17shot attemptsBUFMTL

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 48%.

OT 5:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFMTL
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P2 18:32P. Subban (1), power play 45% to 19%-26
  2. P2 13:06T. Ennis (1) 23% to 49%+26
  3. P2 12:31B. Gallagher (1) 49% to 23%-26
  4. P1 04:26S. Ott (1) 29% to 48%+19

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value comes from both teams' goals for and against to that date, regressed toward the league average early in a season, plus home ice.

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

Replay
OT 4:55
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

2 of 4 winning traits showed up tonight. Win rates are over the full 2012–13 regular season (48 games).

Wins (21)Losses (27, 6 in overtime or a shootout)This game
3+ scorersD combined 3+ ptsScored firstDepth goal50%100%
Yes
3+ different scorers
Sabres win 63% when yes, 34% when no
No
Defensemen combined for 3+ points
too few games to split
No
Scored first
Sabres win 67% when yes, 21% when no
Yes
Depth forward scored
Sabres win 50% when yes, 38% when no

Shift Rhythm

Nothing in either team's shifts stood out: pinned time, short rest were all close to a typical game this season.

BUFMTLTypical game, 2012–13
Pinned time (5v5)0:560:031:04
Shot attempts against while pinned201
Short-rest shifts143022

When Buffalo was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P11:00 to 1:010:0100
P16:19 to 6:350:1600
P113:08 to 13:180:1010
P27:18 to 7:320:1410
P310:54 to 10:550:0100

When Montréal was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P11:00 to 1:030:03
R. Diaz 1:03
00
How this is measured

Pinned. A team is pinned when 3 or more of its skaters on the ice are past a minute of unbroken play, at 5v5. A hemmed-in shift is an even-strength shift in which the unit was on for more than 1:00 without a whistle to change on, and stayed at even strength for most of it. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. Only the time past the minute counts: the first minute of those shifts plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the pinned team is defending (in 2012–13, a pinned team took 32% of the shot attempts; pinned time was 2.4% of all 5v5 play). Pinned time is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Short rest. An even-strength shift a skater started after less than 45 seconds on the bench, same period only (an intermission is a full rest).

Typical game. The middle value across Buffalo games in the 2012–13 regular season, counting both teams (96 team totals), so it stands in for a league-average game. A sentence at the top only appears when a number is among the highest fifth of those, or when a goal went in while a team was pinned.

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is pinned and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

29 shifts, averaging 0:57. 3 hemmed-in, 5 after a short rest, 0:30 pinned.

Replay
Shift 29
Hemmed-in shiftShort rest before itGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:51P2avg 1:01P3avg 0:57OTavg 0:440:000:301:001:302:002:30151015202529Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only. Typical in 2012–13: 0:46, 0:50 (the long change), 0:48.

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
Stafford–Ennis–Foligno110:101110952.6%1.4%7937
Pominville–Vanek–Hodgson19:3602121152.2%1.0%10966
Hecht–Ott–Grigorenko17:10106366.7%16.3%5323
McCormick–Gerbe–Scott12:56001420.0%-32.4%1111
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
Leopold–Ehrhoff110:011010855.6%4.8%9744
Weber–Myers17:131381044.4%-7.9%6957
Sulzer–Brennan15:30006650.0%-1.5%5222
Sulzer–Weber14:01002340.0%-11.7%0302
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1T. VanekBUF | LW2G 0A 2P
2T. EnnisBUF | C1G 2A 3P
3M. FolignoBUF | LW0G 2A 2P

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
SOG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGS
#63 T. Ennis (RW)
1
2
3
+1
0
6
12:0950.0%-0.9%41.2%50.0%1.208
2.5
22:14
#9 S. Ott (C)
1
1
2
+2
2
3
9:2658.3%+9.1%54.5%100.0%1.333
2.1
16:27
#26 T. Vanek (LW)
2
0
2
-1
2
8
11:3751.7%+1.7%52.2%0.0%0.714
1.9
23:56
#82 M. Foligno (LW)
0
2
2
+1
0
0
11:4352.4%+2.4%44.4%50.0%1.107
1.3
20:57
#55 J. Hecht (C)
0
1
1
+1
2
1
11:5761.1%+13.7%60.0%100.0%1.200
1.0
16:23
#8 C. McCormick (C)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6:5433.3%-20.6%44.4%1.000
-0.1
7:14
#19 C. Hodgson (C)
0
0
0
-2
2
4
11:3050.0%-1.1%50.0%0.0%0.750
0.0
20:02
#21 D. Stafford (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
4
11:2750.0%-0.9%42.1%50.0%1.139
0.3
18:26
#25 M. Grigorenko (C)
0
0
0
+1
0
1
10:0762.5%+15.0%69.2%100.0%1.200
0.4
10:34
#29 J. Pominville (RW)
0
0
0
-1
0
3
10:4450.0%-1.0%50.0%0.0%0.714
0.1
22:30
#32 J. Scott (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
0
3:1616.7%-37.0%50.0%1.000
0.0
3:16
#42 N. Gerbe (C)
0
0
0
0
0
1
7:5643.8%-8.8%54.5%1.000
0.0
9:04
#3 J. Leopold (D)
0
0
0
+1
0
2
14:1253.6%+4.6%56.0%100.0%1.143
0.5
23:23
#6 M. Weber (D)
0
0
0
-2
0
0
13:2246.4%-6.8%40.9%25.0%0.843
-0.3
18:23
#10 C. Ehrhoff (D)
0
0
0
+2
0
3
15:1557.7%+10.8%56.5%100.0%1.143
0.6
27:40
#33 T. Brennan (D)
0
0
0
0
2
3
9:5255.0%+5.9%66.7%1.000
0.6
14:47
#52 A. Sulzer (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
12:5950.0%-0.9%53.3%1.000
0.1
18:01
#57 T. Myers (D)
0
0
0
-2
0
0
13:0344.0%-10.0%38.1%25.0%0.870
-0.4
20:46
Total
4
6
10
10
40
10.4

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOIDec
#30 R. Miller324.875-0.263:31W

Team Stats

MTLBUF
32Shots on Goal40
13.0%Shooting % (5v5)10.5%
.895Save % (5v5).870
1.025PDO (5v5)0.975
29 (46%)Faceoffs Won34 (54%)
4Power Play Chances7
25%PP%14%
86%PK%75%
1PPG1
16Penalty Minutes10
20Hits15
12Blocked Shots11
6Giveaways8
5Takeaways3

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
04:11GOAL (MTL): Tomas Plekanec (1), assists: Rene Bourque, Alexei Emelin
04:26GOAL (BUF): Steve Ott (1), assists: Jochen Hecht
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
12:31GOAL (MTL): Brendan Gallagher (1), assists: Brandon Prust, Raphael Diaz
13:06GOAL (BUF): Tyler Ennis (1), assists: Marcus Foligno
18:32GOAL (MTL): P.K. Subban (1), assists: Andrei Markov, Max Pacioretty(PP)
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
00:45GOAL (MTL): Tomas Plekanec (2), assists: Brian Gionta, Rene Bourque
07:57GOAL (BUF): Thomas Vanek (1), assists: Tyler Ennis, Marcus Foligno(PP)
19:58GOAL (BUF): Thomas Vanek (2), assists: Steve Ott, Tyler Ennis(PP)
20:00Period end
OT
00:00Period start
05:00Period end
SO
00:00Period start
00:00GOAL (BUF): Thomas Vanek, unassisted(SO)
00:00GOAL (MTL): Alex Galchenyuk, unassisted(SO)
00:00GOAL (BUF): Jason Pominville, unassisted(SO)
00:00Shootout complete
00:00Period end
00:00Game end
@ OTT (Feb 5, 2013)@ NYI (Feb 9, 2013) ›