@ NJD (Jan 24, 2012)vs NYR (Feb 1, 2012) ›

January 31, 2012

Centre Bell | Montreal

BUF 31 MTL

FINAL

Head-to-Head vs MTL all-time
1ST2ND3RDT
BUF0123
MTL1001
Shots on goal BUF 40, MTL 28W R. MillerL C. Price
Summary

Buffalo had more shot attempts in all situations and won 3-1.

IN NET
Buffalo R. Miller .964
MTL C. Price .949
POWER PLAY
Buffalo 0 of 3
MTL 0 of 1
TURNING POINT
P. Gaustad goal (P3 6:17), Sabres win chance rises from 45% to 80%
WIN DNA
2 of 4 winning traits
Game Leaders
P. Gaustad
3 (1G-2A)
POINTS
P. Gaustad
2.8
GAME SCORE
P. Kaleta
5
SHOTS
J. Pominville
21:33
TOI (F)
T. Myers
23:21
TOI (D)
R. Miller
.964 (27/28)
SAVE %

Stats by Period

All situations, by period.

BUFMTL

Shots on goal are counted from the play-by-play, which on a few games sits one shot off the box score line in the header and Team Stats.

Additional per-period stats
Each cell is BUF-MTL.
 1ST2ND3RDTotal
Faceoffs Won12-910-1111-833-28
Hits8-97-121-516-26
Takeaways1-11-41-13-6
Giveaways5-04-22-211-4
PDO (5v5): BUF 1.030MTL 0.970. Shooting % plus save %. About 1.000 is neutral.

Game Flow

Running shot attempts for and against, all situations. Shading shows who led.

P3 20:00
+42+210-21-42shot attemptsBUFMTL

Dots are goals, navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Score-adjusted weights each attempt by how often teams take one in that score state, home or away, at that point of the game, league-wide (2016-17 to 2025-26): the share as if the game were tied at a neutral site. Score-tied counts only attempts while tied, and needs 15 tied minutes and 30 attempts.

Win Probability

Buffalo's chance of winning, from the score, the time left and the strength state.

Opened at 40%.

P3 20:00
100%75%50%25%0%Buffalo win chanceBUFMTL
BIGGEST SWINGS
  1. P3 06:17P. Gaustad (1) 45% to 80%+35
  2. P2 04:01V. Leino (1) 21% to 42%+21
  3. P1 04:09M. Pacioretty (1) 40% to 23%-17
  4. P3 01:06Tripping on Andreas Engqvist, 2 min 44% to 49%+5

Dots are goals, diamonds penalties, squares a goalie pull; navy for Buffalo.

How this is measured

Each team is expected to score at the league rate for the season, tilted for home ice and scaled for the strength state. The chance Buffalo ends regulation ahead follows from the score and the time left, with a tie going to 3-on-3 overtime and a shootout. The opening value comes from both teams' goals for and against to that date, regressed toward the league average early in a season, plus home ice.

Shot Map

Every shot attempt, to scale.

Replay
P3 19:42
Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

2 of 4 winning traits showed up tonight. Win rates are over the full 2011–12 regular season (82 games).

Wins (39)Losses (43, 11 in overtime or a shootout)This game
3+ scorersD combined 3+ ptsScored firstDepth goal50%100%
Yes
3+ different scorers
Sabres win 74% when yes, 29% when no
No
Defensemen combined for 3+ points
Sabres win 65% when yes, 43% when no
No
Scored first
Sabres win 60% when yes, 36% when no
Yes
Depth forward scored
Sabres win 67% when yes, 35% when no

Shift Rhythm

BUFMTLTypical game
Pinned time (5v5)1:071:32
Shot attempts against while pinned33
Short-rest shifts1930

When Montréal was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P115:20 to 15:230:03
E. Cole 1:09
00
P28:24 to 8:280:0400
P211:46 to 11:580:1210
P214:04 to 14:110:0710
P218:01 to 18:200:1910

When Buffalo was pinned

PeriodClockPinnedSkaters (unbroken play)Attempts againstGA
P213:06 to 13:130:07
D. Roy 1:07
00
P215:22 to 15:360:14
D. Roy 1:07
10
P217:56 to 18:070:11
D. Roy 1:11
00
P38:09 to 8:240:15
D. Roy 1:15
00
P311:19 to 11:310:1220
How this is measured

Pinned. A team is pinned when 3 or more of its skaters on the ice are past a minute of unbroken play, at 5v5. A hemmed-in shift is an even-strength shift in which the unit was on for more than 1:00 without a whistle to change on, and stayed at even strength for most of it. A stoppage inside a shift starts the clock over, however it began: what counts is the run of play they could not get off the ice for. Only the time past the minute counts: the first minute of those shifts plays like any other stretch of the game, while past it the play tilts hard toward the end the pinned team is defending. Pinned time is seconds on the clock, not each skater's seconds added up.

Short rest. An even-strength shift a skater started after less than 45 seconds on the bench, same period only (an intermission is a full rest).

Shots at an empty net are left out of every row. None of this says why a goal went in: a unit that cannot change is pinned and tiring at the same time, so these rows describe when the danger came, not what caused it.

Shift by shift

Shift length, in order, for one Buffalo skater this game.

26 shifts, averaging 0:50. 5 hemmed-in, 2 after a short rest, 0:53 pinned.

Replay
Shift 26
Hemmed-in shiftShort rest before itGoal forGoal againstPenalty takenPower playPenalty killPeriod average and middle half of shifts (even strength)
P1avg 0:35P2avg 1:09P3avg 0:510:000:301:001:302:00151015202526Shift Number

Period averages are even strength only.

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5, and how they did together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
Stafford–Gerbe–Ennis111:4800141548.3%-6.2%101179
Roy–Pominville–Leino19:290010758.8%5.5%7666
Boyes–Gaustad–Kaleta14:16106460.0%6.6%4030
Boyes–Kaleta–Leino14:15005455.6%2.0%3222
Gaustad–McCormick–Ellis14:13005455.6%2.0%5341
Roy–Pominville–Vanek13:32004180.0%26.9%3000
Pageof 1
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIGFGACFCACF%CF% RelFFFASFSA
Ehrhoff–Myers116:1101151944.1%-11.4%111379
Regehr–Leopold113:2810151550.0%-4.3%14898
Sekera–Weber112:1900141351.9%-2.1%91087
Pageof 1

Three Stars

1C. PriceMTL | G2.02 GAA, .949 SV%
2E. ColeMTL | LW0G 0A 0P
3P. GaustadBUF | C1G 2A 3P

Box Score

ON-ICE RATES
Player
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
SOG
iGAx
On-Ice
Game Score
TOI
On-Ice TOIxGF%xGF% RelCF%CF% RelFF%GF%PDOxGSGS
#28 P. Gaustad (C)
1
2
3
+3
0
3
11:1856.0%+3.0%66.7%100.0%1.200
2.8
12:26
#10 C. Ehrhoff (D)
0
2
2
+1
0
3
17:1850.0%-5.7%50.0%50.0%1.000
1.6
23:13
#22 B. Boyes (RW)
0
1
1
+2
0
3
12:4454.8%+1.6%61.1%100.0%1.111
1.3
15:52
#23 V. Leino (LW)
1
0
1
+1
0
2
18:4062.2%+12.9%58.3%100.0%1.083
1.7
21:09
#36 P. Kaleta (RW)
1
0
1
+2
0
5
12:1048.0%-7.4%57.1%100.0%1.167
1.3
13:18
#8 C. McCormick (C)
0
0
0
0
2
1
5:3553.8%+0.2%60.0%1.000
0.1
5:40
#9 D. Roy (C)
0
0
0
-1
0
2
16:4263.6%+14.3%54.5%0.0%0.900
0.4
21:04
#21 D. Stafford (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
3
14:0448.6%-7.7%46.4%1.000
0.5
19:16
#26 T. Vanek (LW)
0
0
0
0
0
0
3:5171.4%+19.0%75.0%
0.2
5:19
#29 J. Pominville (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
3
15:4663.3%+13.3%63.6%50.0%0.975
0.7
21:33
#37 M. Ellis (LW)
0
0
0
-1
0
0
6:1343.8%-11.7%41.7%0.0%0.800
-0.2
6:13
#42 N. Gerbe (C)
0
0
0
0
0
3
14:1943.2%-15.9%42.9%1.000
0.0
15:29
#63 T. Ennis (RW)
0
0
0
0
0
2
13:5845.5%-11.9%45.5%1.000
0.0
18:46
#3 J. Leopold (D)
0
0
0
+2
0
1
16:2557.9%+6.5%65.4%100.0%1.167
0.8
20:10
#6 M. Weber (D)
0
0
0
0
2
5
15:2558.3%+6.9%50.0%1.000
0.6
16:35
#24 R. Regehr (D)
0
0
0
+1
0
1
15:5952.8%-1.4%61.5%100.0%1.091
0.4
17:38
#44 A. Sekera (D)
0
0
0
0
0
1
15:1258.8%+7.5%50.0%1.000
0.4
19:12
#57 T. Myers (D)
0
0
0
0
0
2
16:3344.1%-14.0%45.8%0.0%0.889
-0.1
23:21
Total
3
5
8
4
40
12.3

On-ice rates are 5-on-5. Rel compares to the team with that skater off the ice.

GoalieSAGAxGASV%GSAxGSTOIDec
#30 R. Miller281.9642.059:46W

Team Stats

BUFMTL
40Shots on Goal28
6.7%Shooting % (5v5)3.7%
.963Save % (5v5).933
1.030PDO (5v5)0.970
33 (54%)Faceoffs Won28 (46%)
3Power Play Chances1
0%PP%0%
100%PK%100%
0PPG0
4Penalty Minutes8
16Hits26
16Blocked Shots21
11Giveaways4
3Takeaways6

Full Game Log

1ST
00:00Period start
04:09GOAL (MTL): Max Pacioretty (1), assists: Josh Gorges
20:00Period end
2ND
00:00Period start
04:01GOAL (BUF): Ville Leino (1), assists: Paul Gaustad, Christian Ehrhoff
20:00Period end
3RD
00:00Period start
06:17GOAL (BUF): Paul Gaustad (1), assists: Brad Boyes
19:08GOAL (BUF): Patrick Kaleta (1), assists: Christian Ehrhoff, Paul Gaustad(EN)
20:00Period end
20:00Game end
@ NJD (Jan 24, 2012)vs NYR (Feb 1, 2012) ›