Team Stats

2010–11 Regular Season

Coach: Lindy Ruff
Total Players: 32
Related2010–11 game results2010–11 standingsRound 1 vs PHI breakdown
Season Summary

43-29-10, 96 points, a +12 goal differential.

PENALTIES
Drew 371, took 402 (-31)
Team Totals
240
228
+12
19.4%
83.0%
47.7%
2.78
7.8%
.925
1.003
GF
GA
DIFF
PP%
PK%
FO%
GAA
S% (5v5)
SV% (5v5)
PDO (5v5)
NHL
9th
16th
12th
9th
13th
27th
16th
19th
13th
12th
CONF
4th
9th
6th
3rd
10th
14th
9th
7th
7th
6th
DIV
2nd
3rd
2nd
2nd
3rd
5th
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
ALL-TIME
77th pct
35th pct
50th pct
53rd pct
59th pct
41st pct
50th pct
68th pct

All-time is where 2010–11 ranks among Sabres regular seasons, as a percentile: GF, GA and DIFF since 1970–71 (55 seasons), PP% and PK% since 1977–78 (48), FO% since 1997–98 (28), S% (5v5) and SV% (5v5) since 2009–10 (17). GF, GA and DIFF are relative to each season's league scoring. Higher is better, GA included.

Goal differential
LEAGUE MED +7BUF +12-69+78
One dot per NHL team.
PDO (5v5)
LEAGUE MED 1.001BUF 1.0030.9741.024
One dot per NHL team.
Team Leaders
73
POINTS
41
ASSISTS
+16
PLUS/MINUS
23:20
TOI/G

Skater Scatter

Any two stats, one dot per skater. What is xG?

Dot size is ice time per game. Above the dashed line: more Goals than xG.

X axis:
Y axis:

No skaters match these filters. Lower the games-played floor or widen the position filter.

More cuts on the Stats Playground scatter.

Games 1 (Oct 8) to 82 (Apr 9)

82 games.

Shot Map

Every BUF shot attempt this season, to scale, attacking right.

Shot on goal (size = xG)GoalMissed shot×Blocked shot

Win DNA

Yes-or-no box-score traits, and how often the Sabres won with and without each. Correlation, not cause.

How this is measured

Every counting stat runs higher in a win (you score more when you win), so each game gets a yes-or-no question instead, and the win rate when yes is set against the win rate when no. The gap is the lift, in percentage points. A trait can be a symptom of a good night as much as a reason for one. Shot-attempt share (CF%) is left out: in a single game the trailing team piles up attempts, so out-attempting the opponent has gone with a lower win rate.

43-39 in 82 decided games, 2010–11 regular season, with 10 of those losses in overtime or a shootout.
Wins (43)Losses (39, 10 in overtime or a shootout)
3+ scorersD combined 3+ ptsScored firstDepth goal50%100%

The wider the gap on an axis, the more that trait separates a win from a loss.

The raw split, wins vs losses

The totals the table above deliberately doesn't lead with. Goals and points from both positions climb in wins, but the defense's share of the offense barely moves, which is why the question is who else scored, not whether the D did.

PER GAMEWINS (43)LOSSES (39)
Forward goals3.231.56
Defense goals0.530.44
Forward points7.634.05
Defense points2.531.41
Different goal scorers3.231.82
D share of points25%26%
D share of shots24%24%

Line Combinations

Lines and pairs at 5v5 this season, summed over every game together.

What do TOI, CF, xG% etc. mean?
GP
Games in which this exact line/pair shared the ice together at 5v5.
TOI
Time on ice together at 5v5, meaning the whole line/pair on the ice at once, not any one player's own total. Only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit count, which is why a pair's TOI and xG% here differ slightly from the WOWY table, where together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice.
xGF / xGA
Expected goals for/against while this combo was on the ice, from this site's own xG model.
xG%
Share of on-ice expected goals this combo earned: xGF / (xGF + xGA). The single best read on who controlled play.
GF / GA
Actual goals for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
CF / CA (Corsi For / Against, Shot Attempts)
"Corsi" is just the hockey-analytics name for total shot attempts: shots on goal, missed shots, and blocked shots combined, a volume proxy for who had the puck more. CF is this combo's own attempts, CA is the opponent's.
CF%
Share of on-ice shot attempts (Corsi) this combo earned: CF / (CF + CA).
CF% Rel
This combo's CF% minus the team's own CF% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's play; negative means it dragged it down.
xGF% Rel
This combo's xG% minus the team's own xG% in the minutes this exact combo was NOT on the ice. Positive means the combo lifted the team's expected-goals share; negative means it dragged it down.
FF / FA
Unblocked shot attempts (also called Fenwick): shots on goal plus misses, excluding blocks. One layer closer to real scoring chances than CF/CA.
SF / SA
Shots on goal for/against while this combo was on the ice together.
Minimum Ice Time
Drag the slider on each table down to see combos with less shared ice time. Their percentages get noisier the lower you go, since a combo that barely played together can swing to 100% or 0% off a single shot.
STRENGTH
Forward Lines
LineGPTOIxGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Connolly–Pominville–Vanek29242:050.000.0011826523852.7%2.3%199183142120
Niedermayer–Grier–McCormick26172:380.000.009710615241.1%-9.8%841155882
Hecht–Pominville–Vanek20150:110.000.0010618213657.2%7.0%1389510679
Gaustad–Kaleta–Gerbe25147:180.000.00631399958.4%8.1%98667843
Niedermayer–Grier–Gaustad30136:030.000.005310413543.5%-7.3%78965971
Boyes–Stafford–Ennis15124:110.000.007110012045.5%-5.2%81956371
Roy–Vanek–Ennis23124:070.000.007710211646.8%-3.9%85916671
Gaustad–Mancari–Gerbe15116:180.000.00531048854.2%3.7%90686750
Pageof 2
Defense Pairs
LineGPTOIxGFxGAxG%GFGACFCACF%CF% RelxGF% RelFFFASFSA
Leopold–Montador57771:220.000.00302975678649.0%-1.9%589574458425
Sekera–Myers65631:140.000.00332261951754.5%4.8%461401348291
Morrisonn–Weber40446:590.000.00171339141648.5%-2.3%308305241219
Butler–Myers29299:560.000.00131029925154.4%4.2%230195171132
Morrisonn–Myers32168:510.000.0041116217947.5%-3.1%11914190100
Sekera–Weber33153:480.000.007514115148.3%-2.3%1001126779
Montador–Sekera30142:150.000.0010313914449.1%-1.5%1031077575
Rivet–Sekera17139:240.000.005713912153.5%3.1%96977161
Pageof 2

With or Without You

Buffalo's 5v5 CF% and xGF% with Myers on the ice, with and without each teammate. Δ is together minus apart. That gap is always measured from the named player's side, so the same pair can read positive on one player's table and negative on the other's. 2010–11 regular season, minimum 20:00 together. Together counts every 5v5 second the two share, whoever else is on the ice, so a pair's time and xGF% here differ slightly from the Line Combinations table, which counts only the seconds that exact pair or trio was the unit.

Teammate
TOGETHER
MYERS APART
IMPACT
TOI TogetherCF%xGF%CF%xGF%Δ CF%Δ xGF%
Sekera
634:2854.5%
52.9%
+1.6
Vanek
355:1154.6%
53.3%
+1.3
Ennis
326:0553.3%
53.8%
-0.5
Pominville
321:2557.5%
52.2%
+5.3
Gaustad
310:4953.4%
53.8%
-0.4
Butler
302:0354.4%
53.5%
+0.9
Hecht
295:3560.5%
51.5%
+9.0
McCormick
271:0849.1%
54.8%
-5.7
Connolly
267:2957.3%
52.6%
+4.7
Stafford
252:2753.8%
53.6%
+0.2
Grier
244:5451.5%
54.2%
-2.7
Gerbe
244:5354.9%
53.4%
+1.5
Niedermayer
242:2447.6%
55.1%
-7.5
Morrisonn
169:4246.8%
54.9%
-8.1
Roy
156:0949.7%
54.3%
-4.6
Kaleta
147:1852.1%
53.9%
-1.8
Leopold
105:4656.2%
53.4%
+2.8
Boyes
94:4849.2%
54.1%
-4.9
Mancari
72:4653.5%
53.7%
-0.2
Adam
40:0951.9%
53.7%
-1.8
Ellis
37:4944.1%
54.0%
-9.9
Byron
28:5247.2%
53.8%
-6.6

Skaters

PlayerNo.GPGAPTS+/-PIMPPSHGWGSOGG/60A/60P/60SOG/60S%FO%TOI/G
Thomas Vanek2680324173+22411052381.381.773.1510.2913.4%30.8%17:21
Jason Pominville2973223052+1155122151.001.362.359.7310.2%43.2%18:09
Drew Stafford2162312152+133411041791.811.233.0410.4717.3%30.4%16:32
Tyler Ennis63822029490305012100.931.352.299.809.5%22.2%15:40
Tim Connolly1968132942-10206031510.681.512.197.888.6%45.9%16:55
Tyler Myers57801027370403051220.330.901.244.078.2%0.0%22:27
Jordan Leopold371132235-11365011340.470.801.274.859.7%0.0%23:20
Derek Roy935102535-116201890.882.193.077.8111.2%46.4%19:32
Paul Gaustad2881121931+71011031170.590.931.525.7310.3%59.8%15:08
Nathan Gerbe4264161531+11342031711.131.052.1812.029.4%23.5%13:20
Jochen Hecht5567121729+4400041720.630.891.529.027.0%43.1%17:05
Andrej Sekera447632629+1134000880.110.971.093.293.4%0.0%21:06
Steve Montador47352126+16830001180.210.881.084.924.2%0.0%19:43
Cody McCormick88181220+21420011040.540.811.357.037.7%41.8%10:57
Rob Niedermayer207151419-822001800.330.931.265.306.3%46.7%12:46
Mike Weber65841317+1369000530.240.801.043.257.5%0.0%16:54
Mike Grier2573511160120001070.290.630.916.114.7%32.3%14:24
Brad Boyes22215914+26201460.871.562.437.9810.9%43.2%16:28
Patrick Kaleta3651459-478010650.460.581.047.516.2%41.7%10:11
Chris Butler3449279+826000520.130.470.613.503.8%0.0%18:10
Mark Mancari1220178-112100430.241.711.9510.472.3%50.0%12:19
Shaone Morrisonn2762145-232001440.060.240.302.632.3%0.0%16:10
Luke Adam7219314-612001310.850.281.138.739.7%34.4%11:13
Craig Rivet5223123-512000200.200.400.604.005.0%0.0%13:02
Marc-Andre Gragnani17912302001110.440.871.314.809.1%0.0%15:17
Paul Byron2481120200050.680.681.373.4220.0%40.8%10:57
Mark Parrish102000-2000000.000.000.000.000.0%11:47
Colin Stuart153000+1200050.000.000.007.600.0%50.0%13:09
Matt Ellis3714000-40000200.000.000.008.530.0%48.3%10:03
Total2404106509365423826908.9%

Goalies

PlayerNo.GPWLOTLGAASV%SO
Ryan Miller3066342282.59.9165
Jhonas Enroth1149222.73.9071
Patrick Lalime4070502.96.8900
Total4329106

A goalie is credited a game played for any appearance, relief included, so GP sums above the team's own games played by the number of relief outings. The Total row leaves GP out for that reason.